continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Trusting in our own dog food
Date Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:55:02 GMT
Worth investigating - though I'd prefer we move to a trigger rather  
than poll based build if we can, and move the poll to daily in case a  
trigger gets missed.

Also, remember not all SCMs support this (eg, CVS).

- Brett

On 16/01/2007, at 12:54 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:

> I think we need to change the changes check. Actually, we do an  
> update on all projects to check if we have changes.
> It will be better to use the status command (I don't know if this  
> command exist in all SCM), but with svn, we'll can use 'svn status -u'
>
> I think the changes check will improve performance when working  
> copy is up-to-date
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Brett Porter a écrit :
>> That doesn't actually matter for the client side speed boost. I'm  
>> running 1.4.2 on continuum now.
>> - Brett
>> On 15/01/2007, at 2:21 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>> The svn.apache.org server is a little old too: Powered by Subversion
>>> version 1.3.1 (r19032).
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Brett Porter [mailto:brett@apache.org]
>>> Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 6:46 PM
>>> To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Trusting in our own dog food
>>>
>>> yeah, it's subversion 1.1.4 (ouch!).
>>>
>>> I'm going to look at upgrading!
>>>
>>> On 11/01/2007, at 11:27 PM, Federico Yankelevich wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I read on svn changelog that SVN v1.4 increased a lot the speed for
>>>> comparing local copy with repository.
>>>> Maybe continuum is very slow in SVN update because it is using SVN
>>>> 1.3 (both
>>>> client and server needs to be updated)
>>>>
>>>> see http://subversion.tigris.org/svn_1.4_releasenotes.html
>>>>
>>>> just my 2 cents,
>>>> Federico
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> brettporter wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I have a script to automate installing the latest build  
>>>>> (though
>>>>> would need changes if continuum_ci was turned off).
>>>>>
>>>>> 1.1 is running very well thanks to some sleuthing by Wendy and  
>>>>> quick
>>>>> fixes from Emmanuel.
>>>>>
>>>>> My biggest concern is the scalability of polling. It currently  
>>>>> takes
>>>>> about 30 minutes to just run through all the required svn up  
>>>>> commands
>>>
>>>>> to detect if builds are needed for all the Maven projects.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Brett
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/01/2007, at 10:26 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> good luck ;-)
>>>>>> did you update the 2.1 snapshot ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Arnaud
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/11/07, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like to turn off continuum_ci.sh and instead only use  
>>>>>>> Continuum
>>>
>>>>>>> itself to do CI for Continuum. Any objections?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Brett
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Trusting-in- 
>>>> our-
>>>> own-dog-food-tf2955860.html#a8276485
>>>> Sent from the Continuum - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>

Mime
View raw message