continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <>
Subject Re: Trusting in our own dog food
Date Sun, 14 Jan 2007 23:45:00 GMT
so... you're saying you don't trust our dog food? :)

The only thing it tests differently is:
- works by cron, whereas continuum might go down/hang/something else  
(which is something we should work on fixing if it does, rather than  
rely on
- runs a reactor (can add that as a less frequent build execution in  
continuum too, though).

So, I don't see any reason to keep it - wdyt?

- Brett

On 11/01/2007, at 7:57 PM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:

> Brett Porter wrote:
>> Folks,
>> I'd like to turn off and instead only use  
>> Continuum itself to do CI for Continuum. Any objections?
> I don't see why it should be turned off, but perhaps the automatic  
> notifications can be turned off or just send failures. That way it  
> would verify the product (it will in itself be an integration test)  
> because if the Continuum instance says that something is failing,  
> you should expect an email saying the same right after. Or at least  
> you can check the logs directory if you're suspecting some other  
> failure.
> --
> Trygve

View raw message