continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jesse McConnell" <jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: continuum-webapp models
Date Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:34:44 GMT
no, brett' OP was asking if we could axe some of the unused stuff thats all

On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur <rahul.thakur.xdev@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jesse,
>
> Just trying to understand - why do you suggest we drop the view data
> model (earlier email) if we could? Were you hinting that we use the
> domain entities directly in the view?
>
> I think we should keep separate model for the view data that only
> exposes that required stuff for view preparation.
>
> Rahul
>
>
> Jesse McConnell wrote:
> > yes, the output in the tables wanted certain summaries of data and
> > project group and projects bits like name, group, etc..
> >
> > so those were just model pojo's for ec:table to consume
> >
> > jesse
> >
> > On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur <rahul.thakur.xdev@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I haven't looked at this but is this purely as like a 'view data' for
> >> preparing views for the webapp?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Rahul
> >>
> >>
> >> Brett Porter wrote:
> >> > anyone?
> >> >
> >> > On 01/12/2006, at 11:29 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I see a couple of models in continuum-webapp, which seem to be
> >> >> partially used. Does anyone know if session-models is used any more?
> >> >> What about view-models - only the summary parts still seem valid?
> >> >>
> >> >> - Brett
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>


-- 
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com

Mime
View raw message