continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <>
Subject Re: short term branch for project/group keys
Date Fri, 22 Dec 2006 02:11:54 GMT
Sounds good, as long as the store remains independent of them. I  
don't want to get into the situation like in JIRA where you can't  
rename a string key.

Before starting to hack on this, perhaps you could list out all the  
keys you think are needed, and some examples? I'm interested in how  
it relates to group IDs and artifact IDs in particular.

- Brett

On 22/12/2006, at 6:30 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote:

> I am thinking about pulling a short term branch of continuum with
> rahul and working on getting everything converted to using a string
> based key project and project group reference in all apis and in all
> of the UI decision making items.  He has tomorrow off so I think that
> unless anyone has any big issues with it we'll try and make that
> branch and work on it tomorrow.
> the end result of it would be:
> * int id's for project and project group in the model are for internal
> store usage
> * name's for project and project group are for presentation  
> purposes only
> * key's are for all api usage and passing around un URL's etc.
> some quick benefits are:
> * consistency across all apis and url manipulations
> * ability to add quick url rewriting for direct linking of projects
> * common keys across running continuum instances for clustering
> jesse
> -- 
> jesse mcconnell

View raw message