continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: continuum-webapp models
Date Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:14:27 GMT
Wasn't sure how certain we were about deleting these, so just raised  
an issue (CONTINUUM-1063).

On 14/12/2006, at 10:34 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote:

> no, brett' OP was asking if we could axe some of the unused stuff  
> thats all
>
> On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur <rahul.thakur.xdev@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Jesse,
>>
>> Just trying to understand - why do you suggest we drop the view data
>> model (earlier email) if we could? Were you hinting that we use the
>> domain entities directly in the view?
>>
>> I think we should keep separate model for the view data that only
>> exposes that required stuff for view preparation.
>>
>> Rahul
>>
>>
>> Jesse McConnell wrote:
>> > yes, the output in the tables wanted certain summaries of data and
>> > project group and projects bits like name, group, etc..
>> >
>> > so those were just model pojo's for ec:table to consume
>> >
>> > jesse
>> >
>> > On 12/13/06, Rahul Thakur <rahul.thakur.xdev@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I haven't looked at this but is this purely as like a 'view  
>> data' for
>> >> preparing views for the webapp?
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Rahul
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Brett Porter wrote:
>> >> > anyone?
>> >> >
>> >> > On 01/12/2006, at 11:29 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> I see a couple of models in continuum-webapp, which seem to be
>> >> >> partially used. Does anyone know if session-models is used  
>> any more?
>> >> >> What about view-models - only the summary parts still seem  
>> valid?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> - Brett
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
> -- 
> jesse mcconnell
> jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com

Mime
View raw message