Mailing-List: contact continuum-dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <453E65E2.6090901@israfil.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:13:38 -0400
From: Christian Edward Gruber <cgruber@israfil.net>
Organization: Israfil Consulting Services Corporation
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Project Group Notifiers
References: <a43524d00610241122y51817ba1t3270cd1d8b4372ba@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4479b0f70610241142t16814483j74c64ad65fd3a1e1@mail.gmail.com>
 <a43524d00610241146uf785f2ex3786a7f586f17dcb@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a43524d00610241146uf785f2ex3786a7f586f17dcb@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------030903060102080403020103"

--------------030903060102080403020103
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The above/below scheme makes sense to me.

Christian.

Jesse McConnell wrote:
>>
>> My only slight reservation would be if group-level notifiers can act
>> differently than project-level notifiers. If that's the case, then the
>> behavior of Continuum builds will differ based on which POM is used
>> to add a
>> hierarchy, since the child POMs that are also parents will have their
>> notifiers added at the project level, and would behave accordingly.
>>
>
> well, from the model the actual notifiers are the same class in both
> the groups and the projects, they are just added to a different list
> depending on if they are in the group or the project...so I don't
> _think_ that will be an issue.
>
> jesse
>
> -- 
> jesse mcconnell
> jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
>


-- 

*christian** gruber + process coach and architect*

*Israfil Consulting Services Corporation*

*email** cgruber@israfil.net + bus 905.640.1119 + mob 416.998.6023*


--------------030903060102080403020103--