continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jesse McConnell" <jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Project Group Notifiers
Date Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:28:57 GMT
yes, correct

the P4 notifiers would be applied to P4-P5-P6

jesse

On 10/24/06, Christian Edward Gruber <cgruber@israfil.net> wrote:
> Hmm.  Even though the "below the watermark" notifiers are attached "per
> project", I still think that notifiers defined in intermediary parents
> should be applied to each child project.  True?
>
> Christian
>
> Christian Edward Gruber wrote:
> > The above/below scheme makes sense to me.
> >
> > Christian.
> >
> > Jesse McConnell wrote:
> >
> >>> My only slight reservation would be if group-level notifiers can act
> >>> differently than project-level notifiers. If that's the case, then the
> >>> behavior of Continuum builds will differ based on which POM is used
> >>> to add a
> >>> hierarchy, since the child POMs that are also parents will have their
> >>> notifiers added at the project level, and would behave accordingly.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> well, from the model the actual notifiers are the same class in both
> >> the groups and the projects, they are just added to a different list
> >> depending on if they are in the group or the project...so I don't
> >> _think_ that will be an issue.
> >>
> >> jesse
> >>
> >> --
> >> jesse mcconnell
> >> jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> *christian** gruber + process coach and architect*
>
> *Israfil Consulting Services Corporation*
>
> *email** cgruber@israfil.net + bus 905.640.1119 + mob 416.998.6023*
>
>
>


-- 
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com

Mime
View raw message