Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 56107 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2006 07:31:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2006 07:31:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 54542 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2006 07:31:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-dev-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 54516 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2006 07:31:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact continuum-dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 54505 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2006 07:31:57 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:31:57 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [64.14.253.182] (HELO mail.exist.com) (64.14.253.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:31:56 -0700 Received: from [192.168.241.163] ([58.71.14.245]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.exist.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k7P7UGj8013743 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:30:20 -0700 Message-ID: <44EEA75B.3090700@exist.com> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:31:39 +0800 From: Edwin Punzalan Organization: Exist Software Engineering User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: further feedback on white site References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I've updated the white site with brett's suggestions and a few of my suggested modifications... please don't hesitate to comment. ^_^ Brett Porter wrote: > I was looking at the white site, and had some additional feedback: > > http://people.apache.org/~epunzalan/continuum-white-site/releaseFinish.html > > > Here, It isn't appropriate to list multiple builds, as only one build > was performed. However, there are actually a series of steps as part > of this release - so maybe its better to list them out? Especially if > one fails and terminates the process. > > ie: > (/) check for modifications > (/) modify poms > (x) perform test build > - show failure & output. > > For the first one, you might see it fails and show the files that have > modifications, etc. (this is unlikely on continuum, so is of less > importance). > > http://people.apache.org/~epunzalan/continuum-white-site/releaseProject.html > > > We need to sort out how perform works. Having to enter everything is a > bit tedious if you've just done a prepare. > > To save DB trickery, how about this: we keep a list of prepared > releases in memory and remove them when they are performed. > > That way this page could have a radio for "Perform release prepared > this session" with a dropdown of those releases, and one for "Perform > release from previous SCM tag". Both go to the same screen, but the > first prepopulates everything. > > Same feedback for release finish (here we probably just want the build > output). > > Also think about having that "build in progress" page in the middle > using webwork's action in a background. Worth adding that screen in > the white site, and just have a link on there that says "I'm > impatient, check again now" :) > > Overall, looking nice! > > - Brett >