Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33842 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2006 02:32:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Jul 2006 02:32:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 9558 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2006 02:31:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-dev-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 8292 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2006 02:31:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact continuum-dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 6876 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2006 02:31:21 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 19:31:21 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [129.240.10.4] (HELO pat.uio.no) (129.240.10.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 18:58:27 -0700 Received: from mail-mx7.uio.no ([129.240.10.52]) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FzOYe-0000n8-S6 for continuum-dev@maven.apache.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2006 03:58:04 +0200 Received: from 42.80-202-84.nextgentel.com ([80.202.84.42] helo=[10.0.0.24]) by mail-mx7.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1FzOYZ-0007MO-Ly for continuum-dev@maven.apache.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2006 03:57:59 +0200 Message-ID: <44B062A2.7010903@apache.org> Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 03:57:54 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trygve_Laugst=F8l?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060619) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: introduction References: <1152377023.44afe0bf7ec22@webmail.jpox.org> <44AFFC51.3090804@venisse.net> In-Reply-To: <44AFFC51.3090804@venisse.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.208, required 12, autolearn=disabled, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL 1.66, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 0.14, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > Thanks Erik. > > In Continuum, we use jpox with derby. Lot of users get some exception > with them on requests that failed like foreign key violation, > insert/delete errors, deadlock errors... > > Our problem is this errors doesn't appears all the time and it's very > difficult to reproduce them. I'm not sure (but I think) errors are in > jpox and not in derby. I know deadlock lock and timeout lock are fixed > in the new derby version and we'll update it. Another issue I would like to figure out is why jpox+derby is using exactly 2.0 minutes to start up. Thanks for starting this effort, we've been really close to dumping jpox unless we get some help to figure out our issues with it. -- Trygve