Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 97719 invoked from network); 29 May 2006 17:07:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 May 2006 17:07:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 32151 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2006 17:07:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-continuum-dev-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 32129 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2006 17:07:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact continuum-dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 32118 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2006 17:07:43 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 May 2006 10:07:43 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.222.54.37] (HELO smtp2.israfil.net) (209.222.54.37) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 May 2006 10:07:43 -0700 Received: from djibril (unknown [10.200.200.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp2.israfil.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E62AD43C8 for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 13:21:12 -0400 (EDT) From: "Christian Gruber" To: Subject: RE: branch CI turned off Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 13:07:13 -0400 Organization: Israfil Consulting Services Corporation Message-ID: <0ecc01c68342$54b84340$01c8c80a@djibril> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 In-Reply-To: <447AAB05.1060805@apache.org> Thread-Index: AcaDQ+0RBc00TxR8SuyXlzatU3EyhwAAcgXA X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Speaking of, the 1.1 feature set looks to resolve most of the current = issues we have with daily use of Continuum. Do the developers have any sense = of when we might be able to expect a 1.1 release? I don't mean to = pressure, and I'm not relying on any particular answer, but it would help us know = how much effort to put on workaround solutions, vs. just deferring the = efforts until 1.1 is released. Regards, Christian. christian gruber + agile coach and architect Israfil Consulting Services Corporation email cgruber@israfil.net + bus +1 (905) 6401119 cell: +1 (416) 998-6023 + cell: +1 (410) 900-0796 -----Original Message----- From: Brett Porter [mailto:brett@apache.org]=20 Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 4:04 AM To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: branch CI turned off Yep, I agree with you both. Perhaps removing it after the 1.1 release is = the most appropriate. - Brett Emmanuel Venisse wrote: > I think we'll can remove it when trunk will be in a stable state. I'm=20 > not agree to remove the more stable branch even if it isn't the=20 > development branch. >=20 > Emmanuel >=20 > Brett Porter a =E9crit : >> I've turned off the CI build for continuum-1.0.x, since the=20 >> development focus will all be on trunk now. >> >> I'm not sure if we should svn rm the branch to save confusion, or = move=20 >> it, or just leave it there. Any thoughts? >> >> - Brett >> >=20 --=20 Brett Porter Apache Maven - http://maven.apache.org/ Better Builds with Maven - http://library.mergere.com/