continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Venisse <emman...@venisse.net>
Subject Re: [Proposal] Continuum refactoring
Date Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:30:34 GMT
ok, so we'll have some data object store access (ProjectStore, BuildStore...) and DefaultContinuum

will use them. Webwork actions will use them too or they'll use Continuum interface?

Emmanuel

Brett Porter a écrit :
> +1
> 
> I'm all for splitting up into action components, but retaining a
> Continuum interface as a single entry point to those
> 
> - Brett
> 
> John Casey wrote:
> 
>>I think we have to be careful when splitting up a public api like
>>this. It's possible Continuum may need to be embedded someday, and if
>>so, it would be much better to have a single interface for controlling
>>it...even if it means that interface delegates most of its work. While
>>I think you can probably factor out a lot of the actual logic, we need
>>to preserve that coherent, single-interface accessibility IMO.
>>Besides, we do still have to maintain public API compatibility, since
>>it's only a x.y release...
>>
>>My 2 cents.
>>
>>-john
>>
>>Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I'd like to know your opinions about the continuum refactoring for 1.1
>>>
>>>What we'll do?
>>>
>>>Replace plexus-summit/velocity by JSP/WebWork/SiteMesh
>>>
>>>What i'd like to do?
>>>
>>>Actually, DefaultContinuum class is our centralized code class. With
>>>a framework like webwork, i think we can improve the architecture by
>>>splitting it with this :
>>>- all data manipulations (CRUD) will be in several DAO classes
>>>- all utility methods (is*InQueue, checkoutProject, buildProject*
>>>will be in several utility classes (or action classes in webwork terms)
>>>- in DefaultContinuum, we'll keep only initialization methods
>>>
>>>With this refactoring, i think it will be more easy to migrate to
>>>webwork, and maintenance will be more easy.
>>>
>>>WDYT?
>>>
>>>Emmanuel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message