continuum-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Trygve Laugstøl <tryg...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Continuum White Site
Date Tue, 09 Aug 2005 12:26:47 GMT
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:20:49PM +1200, Rinku wrote:
> >>2) I like the way the 'generated artifacts' are hyperlinked on the
> >>build details page - is it possible not to have the Reports inlined on
> >>the same page but on different page (JUnit, site reports)
> >
> >I'm not sure about inlining the reports - they could be quite large
> >(though I guess the same is true of the build output). If it is going to
> >be a click away anyway, I'm not sure what the advantage is?
> 
> - Yep, thats what I meant 'not' inlining the reports or build logs on the 
> same page as these can get too big for usability/navigability reasons. I 
> think it would be better to keep links to detailed logs/reports.
> 
> >>
> >>ohh...btw, Continuum logo is neat :-) !
> >
> >Yes, I think so too (we're lucky it wasn't me designing it :)
> >
> >- Brett
> >
> Is one one for M2 in design ;-) ?
> 
> On another note, we could use Javascripting for doing stuff (hide/show 
> project groups, expand nodes...), but what about browsers with Javascript 
> disabled? or perhaps I am missing something and its been taken care of (in 
> which case we can skip this!)

Is there really *anyone* that doesn't have a JS enabled browser? I don't
think requiring JS to be enabled for using Continuum is a big deal.

--
Trygve

Mime
View raw message