Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-concerted-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-concerted-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD5C617B5F for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 19:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34627 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2016 19:27:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-concerted-dev-archive@concerted.apache.org Received: (qmail 34584 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2016 19:27:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@concerted.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@concerted.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@concerted.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 34362 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jan 2016 19:27:55 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 19:27:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 03EC2C17BF for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 19:27:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.673 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.673 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2=0.873, KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KGI6Ux27mIqC for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 19:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relayvx11b.securemail.intermedia.net (relayvx11b.securemail.intermedia.net [64.78.52.184]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C68F843ADB for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 19:27:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from securemail.intermedia.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by emg-ca-1-1.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC4B453E78; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 11:27:43 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Concerted may be in need of help MIME-Version: 1.0 x-echoworx-msg-id: c9612f4a-4982-4f9c-afab-21ac4812ec23 x-echoworx-emg-received: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 11:27:43.894 -0800 x-echoworx-action: delivered Received: from 10.254.155.14 ([10.254.155.14]) by emg-ca-1-1 (JAMES SMTP Server 2.3.2) with SMTP ID 972; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 11:27:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from MBX080-W4-CO-1.exch080.serverpod.net (unknown [10.224.117.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by emg-ca-1-1.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAE3053E78; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 11:27:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from MBX080-W4-CO-2.exch080.serverpod.net (10.224.117.102) by MBX080-W4-CO-1.exch080.serverpod.net (10.224.117.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 11:27:42 -0800 Received: from MBX080-W4-CO-2.exch080.serverpod.net ([10.224.117.102]) by mbx080-w4-co-2.exch080.serverpod.net ([10.224.117.102]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 11:27:42 -0800 From: Chris Nauroth To: "dev@concerted.incubator.apache.org" , Ross Gardler , "general@incubator.apache.org" CC: Atri Sharma Thread-Topic: Concerted may be in need of help Thread-Index: AQHRSUZnqpfZaQan2kCnk6e4niMe757wjVcAgACaagCAAelkAIAABW2A//+BIoCAAP1ZgA== Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 19:27:42 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [50.181.140.32] x-source-routing-agent: Processed Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7FEFE3AA413EF34893F4F2DA6BEBBB4B@exch080.serverpod.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Apologies for the prior spam. That was a mishandled list admin email. As a Concerted mentor, I agree with the concern about lack of activity. I think this was a difficult month for the project considering both the general drop in participation and the typical drop in activity that we should expect to happen around the end-of-year holidays. The monthly reporting schedule implicitly requires that an incubating project show some kind of demonstrable progress month-to-month. Still, other podlings did manage to sustain activity and complete a report during this time. I see John has already raised concern about lack of activity in the mentor/shepherd notes. I just seconded that myself. Can we consider giving the PPMC a chance to reset and aim to re-establish steady activity this month? Beyond that, I don't think there is anything more the IPMC can do to help right now. Mentors are already watching over the state of the project and responding quickly to requests for advice. I don't think this is a case where we need to add more mentors. I agree with the sentiment that pushing a project away only to bring it back later could be counter-productive. However, I would interpret a long-term (multi-month) dormant trend as an indicator that the podling isn't viable. --Chris Nauroth On 1/8/16, 8:20 PM, "Chris Nauroth" wrote: >Accept > >--Chris Nauroth > >From: Ross Gardler >> >Date: Friday, January 8, 2016 at 7:54 PM >To: "general@incubator.apache.org" >> >Cc:=20 >"dev@concerted.incubator.apache.orgorg>"=20 >org>>, Atri Sharma > >Subject: RE: Concerted may be in need of help > >+1 > >Sent from my Windows Phone >________________________________ >From: Roman Shaposhnik >Sent: ?1/?8/?2016 7:35 PM >To: general@incubator.apache.org >Cc:=20 >dev@concerted.incubator.apache.orgrg>; Atri Sharma >Subject: Re: Concerted may be in need of help > >On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Ted Dunning >> wrote: >> Atri, >> >> It looks like community building is going slowly with Concerted. This >>is >> understandable as a part-time activity. >> >> Would it be simpler and better for the project to build a community >>outside >> Apache and bring the project back for incubation once you have done so? > >But what's wrong with this community building exercise within the Apache? > >I honestly don't get what this is going to accomplish if we push Concerted >out AND then get them back. > >I also don't get why we're so concerned about this particular community >where we had examples of very, very slow to take off communities in >the Incubator. > >Thanks, >Roman. > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: >general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.orgtor.apache.org> >For additional commands, e-mail: >general-help@incubator.apache.org> >