concerted-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Atri Sharma <atri.j...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Getting the site up
Date Fri, 23 Oct 2015 19:57:02 GMT
Please ignore, just got the commit messages for Infra for setting up the
site.

On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jake, Julian,
>
> http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact#requesting-where says that
> podling website request can only be raised by a Member/PMC Chair.
>
> Could you please advice?
>
> Regards,
>
> Atri
>
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Phew, I figured you could cancel the repo request!
>>
>> Thanks Julian, Jake. I have cancelled the request and will proceed with
>> svnpubsub.
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Jake Farrell <jfarrell@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1, agree with this approach, have seen a lot of projects moving to this
>>> pattern
>>>
>>> -Jake
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I love git, but one reason to use svnpubsub over gitpubsub: web sites
>>> > can be really large, especially if you generate documentation such as
>>> > javadoc each release. When you use gitpubsub the history of the web
>>> > site will be in the git repo that every contributor clones onto their
>>> > laptop, forever.
>>> >
>>> > In Calcite we use git for the main source code, including the "source"
>>> > of the web site, and anyone maintaining the web site maps the
>>> > svnpubsub root onto the site/target directory to which the web site is
>>> > generated. Thus only web site maintainers have the full web site on
>>> > their laptop, and then only one version. (The full history of the web
>>> > site is on the svn server only.)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > Thanks.
>>> > >
>>> > > I will raise request for gitpubsub.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Jake Farrell <jfarrell@apache.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> gitpubsub is not a separate git repo, its a branch in the existing
>>> repo,
>>> > >> similar to github pages.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> svnpubsub would be at something like
>>> > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/concerted/site/publish
>>> > >>
>>> > >> -Jake
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > Hi All,
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > I wanted to check on the website repo we need done. Infrastructure
>>> > asked
>>> > >> us
>>> > >> > if we need gitpubsub or svnpubsub. Although we prefer git,
I
>>> wanted to
>>> > >> > check before raising the actual request for a git repo for
the
>>> > website.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Please advice.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Regards,
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Atri
>>> > >> > --
>>> > >> > Regards,
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Atri
>>> > >> > *l'apprenant*
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Regards,
>>> > >
>>> > > Atri
>>> > > *l'apprenant*
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Atri
>> *l'apprenant*
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Atri
> *l'apprenant*
>



-- 
Regards,

Atri
*l'apprenant*

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message