concerted-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Atri Sharma <atri.j...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Getting the site up
Date Fri, 23 Oct 2015 19:43:45 GMT
Phew, I figured you could cancel the repo request!

Thanks Julian, Jake. I have cancelled the request and will proceed with
svnpubsub.

On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Jake Farrell <jfarrell@apache.org> wrote:

> +1, agree with this approach, have seen a lot of projects moving to this
> pattern
>
> -Jake
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I love git, but one reason to use svnpubsub over gitpubsub: web sites
> > can be really large, especially if you generate documentation such as
> > javadoc each release. When you use gitpubsub the history of the web
> > site will be in the git repo that every contributor clones onto their
> > laptop, forever.
> >
> > In Calcite we use git for the main source code, including the "source"
> > of the web site, and anyone maintaining the web site maps the
> > svnpubsub root onto the site/target directory to which the web site is
> > generated. Thus only web site maintainers have the full web site on
> > their laptop, and then only one version. (The full history of the web
> > site is on the svn server only.)
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > I will raise request for gitpubsub.
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Jake Farrell <jfarrell@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> gitpubsub is not a separate git repo, its a branch in the existing
> repo,
> > >> similar to github pages.
> > >>
> > >> svnpubsub would be at something like
> > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/concerted/site/publish
> > >>
> > >> -Jake
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi All,
> > >> >
> > >> > I wanted to check on the website repo we need done. Infrastructure
> > asked
> > >> us
> > >> > if we need gitpubsub or svnpubsub. Although we prefer git, I wanted
> to
> > >> > check before raising the actual request for a git repo for the
> > website.
> > >> >
> > >> > Please advice.
> > >> >
> > >> > Regards,
> > >> >
> > >> > Atri
> > >> > --
> > >> > Regards,
> > >> >
> > >> > Atri
> > >> > *l'apprenant*
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Atri
> > > *l'apprenant*
> >
>



-- 
Regards,

Atri
*l'apprenant*

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message