community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
Subject Re: Ensure all projects have DOAP RDP files in place
Date Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:44:51 GMT
Hi Sebb, 

Well there are two types of RDF files.
One for the committee/PMC and one for the project (DOAP)

While the committee needs regular updating if it contains the PMC and the Chair

The project needs regular updating for releases and stuff like that (and in case of PLC4X,
the supported languages)
We just moved both together to keep things simple.

Doesn't really matter where they are, it just seems they are usually not maintained as it
might be a little in transparent what files exist, where all files are located, which information
is needed for what and what has to be updated in which situation. Was quite a ride in preparation
of PLC4X graduation to find out which files in which repos were required to be updated to
update the information of the different parts of our infrastructure.

Chris


Am 24.04.19, 14:19 schrieb "sebb" <sebbaz@gmail.com>:

    On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 12:49, Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de> wrote:
    >
    > Hi Sebb,
    >
    > thing is ... from what I can see in the IoT space, it seems till a week ago no-one
was really using the DOAP files for their projects and from looking at the ones I know, it
seemed they were pretty outdated. So I intentionally moved the RDF files to a more prominent
position.
    
    I don't follow how moving the PMC RDF file makes any difference.
    That file does not contain any reference to the IoT space apart
    perhaps from the charter.
    Generally the PMC RDF file can be created and then left alone.
    
    It's the DOAP files that are important for identifying what products
    are available in the various different fields of use.
    
    > Chris
    >
    > Am 24.04.19, 10:29 schrieb "sebb" <sebbaz@gmail.com>:
    >
    >     On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 09:08, Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
wrote:
    >     >
    >     > Hi all,
    >     >
    >     > I’m involved in the IoT track for ACNA and ACEU and was trying to use
[1] to find all Apache in the IoT space. At the time I first visited that page, the Apache
Ignite project was the only project to be listed there … now the PLC4X and Camel have been
added, but it seems most projects are not maintaining their RDP files correctly.
    >     >
    >     > It would be cool if some people could help with fixing this issue for the
projects they are involved with.
    >     >
    >     > Perhaps as a little help. I did the following for the PLC4X project:
    >     >
    >     >   1.  Created the two RDF files (PMC description [2] and Project description
[3]) which are published through our project website and are available at [4] and [5].
    >     >   2.  Registered them in the committees.xml and the projects.xml files here
[6]
    >     >   3.  Wait at most 24 hours
    >
    >     There is no need to create a local PMC description RDF file.
    >     Most TLPs use the ones at
    >     https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/projects.apache.org/trunk/data/committees/
    >
    >     If yours does not exist yet, just create it and add it to committees.xml
    >     There is a template for this purpose:
    >     https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/projects.apache.org/trunk/data/committees/_template.rdf
    >
    >     > Perhaps if you use these as templates, it helps get the files up and running.
    >     >
    >     > The main reason we chose to maintain these files in our project, is that
I have seen quite a lot of projects without maintained RDF files, because they are so invisible
to most of the folks … if for example you have a look at the Flex ref file [7], it still
mentions Alex as chair, which isn’t the case anymore for more than 2 years now.
    >
    >     To avoid duplication and staleness of data, it's best not to use the
    >     PMC RDF files for anything but the minimum, i.e.
    >     id, name and charter
    >
    >     > Our hope is by managing these resources as part of the normal project, they
get a little more visibility and awareness.
    >
    >     Unfortunately experience shows they still get forgotten, particularly
    >     the PMC file (as noted above).
    >
    >     > Chris
    >     >
    >     > [1] https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category
    >     > [2] https://github.com/apache/plc4x/blob/develop/src/site/resources/plc4x-pmc.rdf
    >     > [3] https://github.com/apache/plc4x/blob/develop/src/site/resources/plc4x-doap.rdf
    >     > [4] http://plc4x.apache.org/plc4x-pmc.rdf
    >     > [5] http://plc4x.apache.org/plc4x-doap.rdf
    >     > [6] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/projects.apache.org/trunk/data
    >     > [7] http://flex.apache.org/pmc_Flex.rdf
    >     >
    >
    >     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    >     To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
    >     For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org
    >
    >
    >
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
    For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org
    
    


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org

Mime
View raw message