Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: committee-info.txt and projectName.rdf redundancy
To: dev@community.apache.org
References: <1199dd19-8dc5-52b5-6abd-99b7d18cfc0c@les7arts.com>
	<9b4ec77c-36d4-855a-c992-c5a6239b85a4@les7arts.com>
	<ba854a3b-e6c0-a056-31c2-4f456828b632@les7arts.com>
	<3878386.c4jPdM7FfW@giga>
From: Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com>
Organization: Les Arts Informatiques
Message-ID: <1b21cbeb-b3b2-3098-1467-fe642e653de3@les7arts.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:40:49 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3878386.c4jPdM7FfW@giga>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-GB
archived-at: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 07:40:21 -0000

Thanks Hervé,

Actually the redundancy is in the content of the files. Both gives information about the PMC (mostly for the files in 
comdev\projects.apache.org\data\committees).

So you have to maintain both, but I understand why now.

The committee-info.txt serves as a reference. Do  you know if the projectName.rdf is used by an ASF mechanism, for a content integration somewhere?

Jacques


Le 27/08/2017 à 17:26, Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
> Hi Jacques,
>
> I don't really get what redundancy you're talking about (nor link with cited
> commit, nor what discussion I had with Sebastian...)
>
> One thing is that committee-info.txt is an ASF private resource where rdf files
> are fully public. And RDF/DOAP files are supposed to give a full model of
> everything for public share.
>
> I was not at the beginning of DOAP deployment but just worked on the new
> projects.a.o site, then I really have no idea on initial intends: I'm just
> trying to guess like anybody else...
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le samedi 26 août 2017, 22:20:03 CEST Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>> Le 26/08/2017 à 21:58, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>>> Le 26/08/2017 à 20:15, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Why is there a redundancy with committee-info.txt and projectName.rdf
>>>> files at comdev\projects.apache.org\data\committees ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org
>>> I mean about the PMC part in projectName.rdf of course
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org
>> OK this is related with http://svn.apache.org/r1691273
>> and the discussion Hervé and Sebastian had (could not find it at
>> https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@community.apache.org:lte=3M:1691273)
>>
>> Ah forgot one point: committee-info.txt is maintained by chairs when
>> projectName.rdf files are accessible to all committers (or PMC members, or
>> ASF members? I'm all that, so not sure if others have the same accesses).
>>
>> After reading the discussion between Hervé and Sebastian, the question still
>> stands, why both?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org