Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF3E200CAB for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 23:17:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 6E5AF160BE3; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 21:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CAC1160BD1 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 23:17:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 82695 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2017 21:17:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 82683 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2017 21:17:07 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 21:17:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id AF1511812CA for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 21:17:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.679 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.679 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vJE9iNDe7rOU for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 21:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 21CFD5FBD8 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 21:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id d64so14470907wmf.1 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 14:17:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=H1uA6m91h1WjCANWU0+MY8dvPX5jqZhxzAt3bfUjmTc=; b=EqiKs4A4I06AuoCF0yg/hPWukMwkmvxyQ5AJNDr8A1zbrKHOFrGo5KmQVLir1wQ9Ez GIgBpPg61kvWERToYpiAMOlifUBbdIZvbqXF3NO8tWjFkQtO50Q+z3DZlL7uE6S3iMSk H0Uzb5NKZ8hES0x5jNTFKOCrwqPI8Au1/COhiRS5VOYpWn6mRfhGBfKHHlhu0LImoPPj Dl9iucIL2EHC1awYR/mXjBdnifQ6e5fBNX2+ZPxS34S/BRr49uF98PKM95Sg7ii7QvBd G/Nu3bOfF3pcsAQdCVbpajYgoaj5bdUjgI3wkGPqK5oi31vdQO3nDY4bWro9siV4Pf2M nGLg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=H1uA6m91h1WjCANWU0+MY8dvPX5jqZhxzAt3bfUjmTc=; b=hmBrAElwlP6xZRFNThgWA8SxRnqfkcepcSL47xb7Rlggl8OxKEpSX1dVCBXdzDri8T OO7OeuVj5YEpQ/ZIAM2ecs6UCLGXTQdtg7ZMmaynN122wohSDJvhSa73hxsuGrVaWwoe R5eUyOnrRf6sxKootLCNyiUEowMx+ewQPNNVIxgHjBea0ztrDtFYtdpqS19vq2aGp2bT eyj3Y6riPfLccmWYduPblMPRnfOWLTD/50hlablU+68wJR4OCpk+n0WHWYSWQiATt7FV cnvRG0nKyKvVcshuS7JeIw7mHzjOpDX9nhGMU9G4ij8x/KoMwYlQ4KSqudNdauMoFyXx 8ChQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwHfeKf58y3XfyK2mOTylKc+nhxDzebkp0oZTwsoALNAyoe6ML9 bWIMM0zozcpVvzJY3u1FqF6b/idPnMMG X-Received: by 10.28.191.26 with SMTP id p26mr12913495wmf.89.1497820623833; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 14:17:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.170.144 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 14:17:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <79adc426-f8b5-cf20-445e-bf8d2bc2e179@apache.org> From: sebb Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 22:17:03 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: New reporter UI To: dev@community.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" archived-at: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 21:17:09 -0000 On 18 June 2017 at 17:06, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 06/18/2017 03:15 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 18 June 2017 at 09:06, Daniel Gruno wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> I've been working on a new UI for the reporter tool today, and I think >>> it's coming together nicely. The new UI can be seen at >>> https://reporter.apache.org/ng.html and should prove to be less >>> clunky/flashy compared to the old one. >>> >>> Unless I hear otherwise, I'll change this to be the default UI for the >>> reporter tool in a few days. Comments, feedback etc is of course very >>> welcome! >> >> Sorry, but I much prefer the current style. >> It seems cleaner to me. >> >> In comparison with the current style, to my mind the proposed style >> has the following disadvantages: >> - it's not immediately obvious which tab is selected > > I'm not sure how to interpret this, but I have changed the text color so > it should be more obvious which tab is selected. > >> - "Add a tab" only works for members and does not actually add a tab >> each time it is used. > > This has now been addressed. > >> - not as easy to read the tab text as it fills the space > > I'm sorry but I don't understand the criticism here. Could you > elaborate? or maybe your browser displays something I'm not seeing. > Perhaps a screenshot would be helpful. Try adding httpcomponents trafficserver and you should see what I mean. The original tabs allowed space before and after the text. >> - not as easy to read the tab contents as the contrast is reduced > > Assuming you mean the ToC links, I have made them more visible now. Hope > this addresses the concern. I meant all the text, however the ToC were the worst affected. >> - tab shapes are not as nice as before > > I frankly found it too flashy in the end (even though I originally > created them that way)...a matter of taste I suppose :) > >> - the surrounding dark background is distracting > > The CSS is there for people to change if they can come up with a better > color scheme (css/tabs.css) :) > >> - the back to top links don't take one back to the top > > I have addressed this issue now, it should link to the very top again. > >> - the footer contents are always visible (or would be, if an alignment >> bug were fixed) so it's always obvious whom to contact > > I'm assuming you mean the footer is _not_ always visible now. I don't Yes. > think that's a real issue, and I don't think we make use of an 'always > visible' footer in many places. Maybe some of the info could be presented in the header instead. e.g. Managed by and About links It's important that people can readily find how to report problems. > > I hope this addresses your concerns. > > With regards, > Daniel. > >> >> The improvements: >> - the page footer is not obscured by the scroll box (that should be fixable) >> - it's possibly slightly easier to scroll the whole page rather than >> scrolling within the box. But this does mean the footer is not always >> available. >> >> I'd much rather see the few minor issues with the current layout fixed. >> >>> With regards, >>> Daniel. >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org