community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Owen O'Malley" <owen.omal...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Where's the code?
Date Wed, 21 Jun 2017 19:24:19 GMT
Ok, I made the change to ORC's site as a demo.

http://orc.apache.org/bugs
http://orc.apache.org/downloads
http://orc.apache.org/releases
http://orc.apache.org/src
http://orc.apache.org/web-src

All redirect to the appropriate urls. The patch is
https://github.com/apache/orc/commit/96a4ea96896d6bfbe5c372820228f4b48aa9f055
.

.. Owen



On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Owen O'Malley <owen.omalley@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Actually, I'd go the other way. It would be good if projects would set up
> a standard set of redirects at the top level of the project.
>
> foo.apache.org/bugs -> Bug database (eg. jira instance)
> /src -> User browsable source repository (eg. github mirror)
> /downloads -> Download page
> /release -> Release notes for the current release
> /web-src -> User browsable site source
>
> On ORC, I did the equivalent, but I picked names using company trademarks,
> which is sub-optimal:
>
> http://orc.apache.org/jira -> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/orc
> http://orc.apache.org/github -> https://github.com/apache/orc
>
> .. Owen
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Shane Curcuru <asf@shanecurcuru.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Rich Bowen wrote on 6/21/17 1:19 PM:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 06/21/2017 05:29 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Rich Bowen <rbowen@rcbowen.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> FYI:
>> >>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1BxQzPVnzyAUD8NpCNB1M
>> IwvlglU1G5lTXAvYGzkSlP0/edit#gid=0
>> >>> if you want to play along.
>> >> Is there any way that this can be integrated into
>> >> https://whimsy.apache.org/site/ ?
>> >>
>> >> Advantages: individual projects can do self discovery, and the list
>> >> would be updated automatically.
>> >>
>> >> What we would need is some sort of rules as to what you are expecting
>> >> to see for every site.
>> >
>> > That would be awesome. I presume that what we'd want to do is start with
>> > the phrase "Source Repositories" and then add more as we discover them.
>> > Sites that lack them at present, we'd just add "Source Repositories" and
>> > they'd match.
>>
>> If we're doing something new, why not use rel="" values?
>>
>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Link_types
>>
>> We could even abuse the rel= attribute to add some of our own keys if we
>> really wanted to.  This would make link checking super-easy for sites
>> that use it.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> - Shane
>>   https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message