community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Vetoes for New Committers??
Date Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:22:07 GMT

> On Mar 29, 2017, at 9:11 AM, Pierre Smits <pierre.smits@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Applying the 'consensus', (or rather the 'every thing must be discussed
> first') aspect everywhere is equally tyrranical.
> 
> Hence the existence of the simple majority vote (50% of votes cast, + 1
> with a min of 3 votes) for procedural matters. And onboarding new
> committers, members, officers, etc. is a procedural matter. Unless, of
> course, explicitly defined in bylaws.
> 
> A -1 is nothing more than an expression of a viewpoint. Without all the
> rhetoric!

The issue w/ majority ruling is that it tends to self-perpetuate,
and ensure that the majority continues to rule. It is ripe for
abuse.

If a PMC must "resort" to resolving things via "well, the majority ruled
for it" then, imo, it is NOT a healthy and viable community, NOT one
that will survive long term, NOT one which in in tune with the
community.

Consistent lack of being able to achieve consensus is a symptom of dysfunction
and a severe warning sign. It is not to be ignored.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org


Mime
View raw message