Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E920200C1C for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 06:00:42 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 3D48A160B5F; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 05:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 5DE2A160B52 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 06:00:41 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 11642 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2017 05:00:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 11525 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2017 05:00:35 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 05:00:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 970CE180028 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 05:00:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.38 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.38 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eRGoEO4soZBk for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 05:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-f182.google.com (mail-qk0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 4326B5F253 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 05:00:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f182.google.com with SMTP id s186so6508145qkb.1 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 21:00:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=2zUbMWEuuI8+T0Lm7LQZbve9bvZSnzw+DZKTT7ST4o4=; b=rKm169hEg482EeionMdiiP79ev/PeeTrzlBB1SBEDV48jxNAQDLCvDTg6+JlJPsc0Z 4c+D5ziPhIMwHcLnUEFkIrbvPYM8m+tCm/cgtJ/o5zp8l3tExoS/qrDivtZZebvw7hm5 pvlhRBp4NeYL8BkVXtXNy38M8SdR860DNDtF4DsBSQQt24e305T8Ih6C+wKPjA5hR53U XO7dKSfmnvu6IHBL7xkz/S8FJvD/EVqQtBayBPweLwWAUBBhfBiy1VUo7cMfuDxbiJrA Si40O58ycAJ3EhRfFze+8ZHPTwQGFdjGoiuaZl4UgcY6p4d6ouvB6G7uMdWGZoz7WK1u 8C2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=2zUbMWEuuI8+T0Lm7LQZbve9bvZSnzw+DZKTT7ST4o4=; b=EEasnwuVLA4Yk/QJ1EGXbLpRWypyAYkfkByO2UpyX9peAc9NgTrLwZH5vCqOG9DtGu 3f1zktNs74yGhglg1ZM59ySPp4OD5EnFjHMQLaHrc3RYg22uHnjxYIdc1tbKxy1OK3OE Saic0grq3pdwAgJwK0V6nkYNCkJg3z9RPHFSXuLQZjiegJZpu2pP2l09qkACLePxmQj7 cs3+HVNgY7636sP9UsKkwFNvDfr6EF0F8KUXS4PkI4m+qziIFCvh+Alxg2W6u7Vjz/DO +yk/7dXSiJT/Q6WW4V1N9FLrJZjq+MAzSJPEc+2eePZQF9r0QRmkc4HCvSeZCEUrjmDe FQjg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39l04pq3a9FfyGDkNfIrfSH7I4PpD1G4iC2yBq7GCNjuiOkZMPLO5zFTGKNEmFU+mQ== X-Received: by 10.55.200.195 with SMTP id t64mr871970qkl.294.1485925228111; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 21:00:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.7] (pool-108-16-111-128.phlapa.fios.verizon.net. [108.16.111.128]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g32sm17588201qtd.28.2017.01.31.21.00.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Jan 2017 21:00:27 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Profile photos and ASF values From: "P. Taylor Goetz" X-Mailer: iPad Mail (14C92) In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 00:00:27 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: dev@community.apache.org archived-at: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 05:00:42 -0000 +1 for Ted's approach. I'm young in terms of ASF years, but I've found it to be very apolitical. Re= cently it's actually been a refreshing departure from what seems like an ava= lanche. It seems most people here seem to check their personal beliefs at th= e door. My guess is that it is a case of innocence, but a follow up with information= about cultural sensitivities seems prudent. -Taylor > On Jan 31, 2017, at 7:14 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: >=20 > As Ted pointed out, it is an ancient symbol found in most Far East > mythology and the Hindu religion. "Out here" you will find it quite often,= > on shops, temples and business cards. It doesn't "carry weight" unless it > comes in black on white, with the Nazi proportions of widths. The Nazi one= > was also at an angle. >=20 > We all know that in this instance, there is no malignant intent, and shoul= d > not require any action. >=20 > And we have not had any case of "red and black" and "something needs to be= > said" as far as I know. >=20 > But the 'solution' is relatively simple; ASF is a non-political > organization, and expression of political views (such as showing political= > allegiance, berating political figures, commenting on political activity, > and so on) is not acceptable, regardless if that is a hate organization > like the Nazis or more moderate political statements that many may agree > with, say recent elections in the world or outbreaks of war. We should not= > be involved, I think we are even obliged by Law to not be involved. >=20 > Cheers > Niclas >=20 >> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Andrew Palumbo wrote= : >>=20 >> I am pretty new around here and don't know if this is a more private room= >> for ASF members .. but my .02: of it is in red and black, then something= >> needs to be said. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone >>=20 >>=20 >> -------- Original message -------- >> From: Ted Dunning >> Date: 01/31/2017 3:50 PM (GMT-08:00) >> To: dev@community.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Profile photos and ASF values >>=20 >> Yeah... I twitched when I saw that. >>=20 >> My suspicion is that this is being used in the ancient, pre-nazi sense. >>=20 >> It is hard to believe that somebody is ignorant of the impact it must hav= e >> on some readers. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Christopher wrote= : >>>=20 >>> Hi all, >>>=20 >>> It is surprising to me that a certain individual participant in ASF >> forums >>> seems to be using a swastika as their Google profile photo. The impact o= f >>> this is that ASF users which use GMail to interact with the mailing >> lists, >>> are presented with this swastika whenever reading or interacting with AS= F >>> forums using GMail. >>>=20 >>> To be clear, this symbol can have alternate meanings, and it may not be >>> intentionally being used as Nazi symbol. Additionally, even if this >>> individual holds to certain ideologies which may be antithetical to ASF >>> community inclusive values, they may act entirely professional and in >>> accordance with ASF code of conduct on Apache forums. So, I don't want t= o >>> imply that the profile photo is indicative of their ASF interactions... >> it >>> may be an entirely separate thing. >>>=20 >>> My main inquiry here is to question whether or not there is a concern, >>> because the use of such profile photos may actually have consequences of= >>> deterring potential new committers, because Apache may be indicted by >>> association. >>>=20 >>> Is there something we wish to do about this? Is it a non-issue? I really= >>> don't know. All I know, is my gut tells me that I'm bothered when I see >> it >>> (I use GMail). But, I don't want to overreact, or start a witch hunt. I'= m >>> genuinely curious if this is something we want to address at all. >>>=20 >>> If the profile photo is used on ASF infrastructure (JIRA, affiliated as a= >>> member of the Apache org on GitHub, etc.), then I think we probably do >> want >>> to address it in the Code of Conduct. However, unrelated services like >>> Google profile photos... that may not be something we want to address, >>> because the web mail client users use is not related to ASF services >> (even >>> if it were know for user that it impacted ASF community by deterring >>> potential new community members). >>>=20 >>> In any case, I don't raise this issue to demean the individual whose >>> profile photo came to my attention... this is not an attack on them. >> Again, >>> this is not a witch hunt. >>> -- >>> Christopher >>>=20 >>=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org