Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A53200BE4 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:22:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 5039C160B26; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 70B9D160B0C for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:22:57 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 23958 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2016 13:22:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 23942 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2016 13:22:56 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:22:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id ADD8F180147 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:22:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.72 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.72 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rcbowen-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T5GyzSMvIhQD for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt0-f181.google.com (mail-qt0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 50E4B5F298 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-f181.google.com with SMTP id p16so203095560qta.0 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 05:22:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rcbowen-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=Hz+ayUWDHAPQSUtCE//yLcL3qcRw0S8xFFVuEm37vG8=; b=Rla9W2R4KIWwSHF0brbYzPnDcjtGQIk2N2sZMlUpnTWhzbOWBj0efmpcehoIHUi391 Z4cf85fV2BBO3kEh3En9TdwN8f9fMBZ+oWEoZVUXNvD8I6XrdUNO6G1x1o/CBVOC+ngx s/znQWMaETtte/ptCnFicOfM8VOqHM5zBqPxoDNxWuK9qwvpzREB57IJ8HG0C5jFldeF iCBHugHlEdxnlyaoBCMSzU97r3efcO7RMuad3zwDy9S6qCcgINJOHUNKrvOb/OP/1h3A F2J0DfILN++IHVJ//V8FaluXGCrRvdvdKQQ2iqdw+uji6A8dETWssUAKM9ZpB4x0fqIe 2tKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Hz+ayUWDHAPQSUtCE//yLcL3qcRw0S8xFFVuEm37vG8=; b=J/Zq34vw9WvOYSR2mMNKFUvWzFb6/MlxEEUi9ooDSvsWED7+UeXYNg/XUW5zrWdteP wSG1psSWfQi+QsPptopGtiiPHR4qzn/0xtwtG4bZ3inRe3dAbRDyHuxJL3hVdN+sjSVs ytF4eVlftnuIrwfDCLP29jPPQv55zVU/1W9+UgFfZRMJj8F4ptI/Akek5tWYSr094kNx DcZv8l8dLWNmh+Py76usq3Wr6WFYHVT+KU/pUI+hvryTMx/F8kTVp/Jnj+4MneT34M6x 8MMDE/mXBa5YxbjLyac35NLm8/uHWpMqU2JxjLNKLETw3Kf6R8358Idf1fp40P5uM8Iq FA9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJXFBgOHgIGJm+h2/5EHXVFcXrX6bpzAmC0G5KJYG2us1VFl2mCRP6BVHfyk/468w== X-Received: by 10.200.50.53 with SMTP id x50mr4385895qta.207.1482326571502; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 05:22:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.176] (cpe-192-180-213-35.kya.res.rr.com. [192.180.213.35]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h43sm15497551qth.29.2016.12.21.05.22.50 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 05:22:50 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Results: ASF Committer Diversity Survey To: dev@community.apache.org References: <20e8c3a3-5c07-425e-5143-c1b11b63eeff@rcbowen.com> <3bb72e9de452a8397dee01d4938befd6.squirrel@uli.ustaerk.de> From: Rich Bowen Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 08:22:48 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3bb72e9de452a8397dee01d4938befd6.squirrel@uli.ustaerk.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXvAr1BHfC8w5tpqubBKJhHk4lCetnciV" archived-at: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:22:58 -0000 --OXvAr1BHfC8w5tpqubBKJhHk4lCetnciV Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="wEfStB28KQQK56OfNuT71uS5J0V8mgvBW"; protected-headers="v1" From: Rich Bowen To: dev@community.apache.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: Results: ASF Committer Diversity Survey References: <20e8c3a3-5c07-425e-5143-c1b11b63eeff@rcbowen.com> <3bb72e9de452a8397dee01d4938befd6.squirrel@uli.ustaerk.de> In-Reply-To: <3bb72e9de452a8397dee01d4938befd6.squirrel@uli.ustaerk.de> --wEfStB28KQQK56OfNuT71uS5J0V8mgvBW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/21/2016 03:09 AM, "Ulrich St=C3=A4rk" wrote: > On Tue, December 20, 2016 17:11, Rich Bowen wrote: >> >> >> On 12/19/2016 08:36 AM, Sharan F wrote: >>> Hello Everyone >>> >>> A big thank you to everyone that has helped or participated in gettin= g >>> the Committer Diversity Survey out, and also to all the committers th= at >>> responded to the survey. It has been really good to be able to collec= t >>> this information and see what it tells us about our committer base. >>> >>> I've loaded the main data and graphs from the survey onto the Communi= ty >>> Development wiki (see link below) >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/ASF+Committer+Dive= rsity+Survey+-+2016 >>> >>> >>> In total we received 765 responses (out of a 5861 committer base at t= he >>> time the survey was run) so around a 13% response rate. >> >> It would be useful to pursue Niclas' assertion that most of our >> registered committers are inactive. I'd think that if we define >> "inactive" in some measurable way, we could determine some actual >> numbers around that. >=20 > Since everything these days is going through LDAP it should be possible= to > get e.g. last login timestamp. Maybe reach out to infra? Sure, if that's our definition of "active". Likewise, if "commit" is our definition of "active", that seems easy too. I tend to think that "active" is a bit more complex, but either one of those would give us a good first estimate. --=20 Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon --wEfStB28KQQK56OfNuT71uS5J0V8mgvBW-- --OXvAr1BHfC8w5tpqubBKJhHk4lCetnciV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYWoIoAAoJEHhwUUeLEqujCn8P+wdqeZJ6hp8FRHNf5Lxnqa2g +wvXGedYKQCQcuOl2g3QrXPK/Z/wfJUVsfFXADvIhE4Q2lYnJlREgR6W+fbURuZk 7E11EuvGRvQ/uPeIBiZG8waoIvf/cBzRqTaAjM1UC5zU6PPaxstQvJKRtrg1hmLH BjOuK53I9OUaOfXji+yyQhLBce5XTuY/X3lYjc8ie517BnR9M4SK+B29g4HcBXoT 1Vc+QRQma2kxUrSuboNBRvO3NOntb1lLTppIQPolnKZYPhYRywUHSaOYN60V42Ij 4fHM3cfRdz9Zixr0m2+aRo81tooAkVGIFAbwjYRVh4N66UcIXjzmtCDwxUID5jFh Ajfax3tKq7/m5QDHj5Apm7yhomvkkY9DJ67msiSZqNPyREF3rrMzLE6itk2y6XIS gsZKWvBr2Naz1czdJovbP8Tn4Bwt3VS1XQ8CBxUlGDnS3OH6DpQzVx1eZMQuikhb l5/xsWmhJJMVRa7weLgWvhE/xJHXXpJNbKAM6fX37H7lQ46yOk8Kh6g4bSVYqN6m mC7Xo2ksmsjTulbUg4zMEPt/MV2hkXMdNy5MtdhY3LlCwpVyGl9Cw4HH/SoCh1xr oIoQY/OvJ7AbDeW5iNUbfYkWWYJa5qdE3VRm89KwejdkVQqkfsd0SWcNcezMCwcK Y8Zm0nUOn1S1WRM1mqT3 =Wiya -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXvAr1BHfC8w5tpqubBKJhHk4lCetnciV--