Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AECA200BF1 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 05:39:44 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 87E80160B30; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AD9D1160B21 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 05:39:43 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 66111 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2016 04:39:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 66095 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2016 04:39:42 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:39:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id EEB60C0186 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:39:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.281 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.281 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fJjnTwNscDxC for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:39:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f46.google.com (mail-oi0-f46.google.com [209.85.218.46]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 975C35F245 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f46.google.com with SMTP id v84so166512648oie.3 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:39:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=TWu4acgPMaFZgjYFRrn6WtWKYIg/+NjmiY0BK7dm1Sw=; b=C98ZbCxs5FlzvQWlJw1Lu0BEQi7vaBAiAoBz+MYenc0SZyb51in/JWLZWmTpKLc+OI hkJzt/ol9kNCBoNRP4VSx622dPnH1KMOKS9whghMAmqDR0lJ+uMHbDBeGFIdDjIeFPO7 uvKd89IJtKIu/CAM1ZrnGKZGdGXugpJ4n2B1Gy7WAX/pkCycLXuOYOicNHyswlFrvJYW YIu+VEvDxKBQjoNEoERAjKBDSCNpq7sveUEWokxvv4v5z+dyKGIkLeQk1rPihABXWsyH RP9Q4unpkrei6aeUHwbYCq5M0rPHgU8OtgjM7PyF/GuiwG0CkzOvPEFwmB1xCUCoh0fq GjAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=TWu4acgPMaFZgjYFRrn6WtWKYIg/+NjmiY0BK7dm1Sw=; b=kr4bvBgsHTOahCLSc0/rETSQc1mx45uRy0TVVUp0c7yjpGNCfTOajvb3+lIq39azMT Eff4ezqUGYPCQP70C1J4W2GMARU/iBIvSXCp5Ku2dMffTt5ZYUEsTe/7N3fiJ1q99tCr 1oO0pnlCkO3ul8oy/k3+GyMb/uy1KCZLh5DS8HlUT/5kbKVbXcNIChgSROFqxAkW18Fh LtaWP0T3aWzgypRntKEyCkgWe2zhqj+K33d/Xw4ZLxRu7eWqaI7mu6rXIpcpdUO9QygM uC1RxnyqeKXMczAHPtAFPtP9zpu3uuL/ny6bmKtd9TCsI8wSw5I3Otg65K3ye0+uhm6x LqTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00IA/W+f35fIUzQSiQL8NfKcQyn9oEvDZ4N8eLgAGoJyr6HSajLIurO1iscHRHRO4Qjx3H9zWBUzAWnKw== X-Received: by 10.157.5.166 with SMTP id 35mr10565785otd.50.1482208775068; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:39:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: hedhman@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.236.18 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:39:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <751AE4EB-D69E-40A5-981A-B82500110D3F@pbw.id.au> From: Niclas Hedhman Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:39:14 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: P4jehsaZedlXlq84ZqkBpskD990 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Results: ASF Committer Diversity Survey To: dev@community.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d0e8885620d05440f9f77 archived-at: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:39:44 -0000 --001a113d0e8885620d05440f9f77 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Shawn, maybe, just maybe, the twitter-activists will spot this and descend on the ASF with vengeance, realizing that the Apache License (and all software that uses it) is sexist, racist and bigoted, since it doesn't prevent sexists, racists and other haters from using our software. And WE, the ASF, do nothing about that. WE are on the side of the haters. This is the logic that is applied elsewhere. That is one of the fears _I_ have about digging in this. It is like searching for patents... And YES, I am on the side of free usage of the software we produce, even by people I am diametrically opposed to. I think it is not ASF's mission to determine that line in the sand. All this is a political issue, disguised with a "it is good for us" label, and many here look at the label and go "Yeah, I favor that." I hope I am wrong about ASF ending up being a target by the outside SJW activists, that we are too small to bother with. But let it be known, it has now been a predicted possibility... so don't be shocked if it happens. Sharan, About the numbers; 1. Most of the registered committers have been inactive for years, many have never been active in the past and was part of a bulk inclusion of committers via a podling coming in. 2. Are there similar surveys available for say Linux Kernel, Debian or GNU/FSF (i.e. other low-visibility, highly technical FOSS projects) ?? 3. The survey was targeted at committers. Shouldn't we also find out who "uses" our software. After all, by-and-large, we attract our committers from our users ("who has an itch to scratch"). That is a primary point of "conversion" and if the selection pool is not much different from the stats that you have now collected... (yes, speculation) ... does that mean we are done? It is also much harder to reach that group. 4. When will the scrubbed raw data be available for the community? Cheers Niclas On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Shawn McKinney wrote: > > > On Dec 19, 2016, at 8:31 PM, Peter West wrote: > > > > The ASF has free software, freely produced by anyone who wants to put > his or her hand up. Talk about =E2=80=9Cdiversity=E2=80=9D is deeply div= isive, and all of > the BS that accompanies it is the antithesis of freedom. It is the impul= se > of petty totalitarians who are determined to impose their views on others= , > and to marginalise and denigrate and demonise those who think=E2=80=A6div= ersely. > Need I mention Brendan Eich here? > > > > So keep this stuff out of the ASF, please. You are free to pursue > whatever other (non-software) obsessions you like in your own time, and > those big software houses with their diversity departments will accomodat= e > you at work. > > Confused by this viewpoint. Here we have a set of statistics (thanks > Sharon) that provides insight into the types of people that participate. > If that info can then be put into use and expands our committer base beyo= nd > the typical into the atypical we would then produce more/better software. > What=E2=80=99s wrong with that? I see only practical usages from this bu= t maybe > I=E2=80=99m just being naive? > > Shawn > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@community.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@community.apache.org > > --=20 Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java --001a113d0e8885620d05440f9f77--