Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org
From: Joseph Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com.INVALID>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: ombudsman@ (was Encouraging More Women to Participate on Apache Projects?)
Message-Id: <CE81D4AB-C2F4-4386-A660-E3C2DF56AF09@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 19:17:17 -0400
References: <573DD91F.5090001@gmail.com> <CA+ULb+uO9ObyXahi3m=eEVkscWc0TFSoVV16yOUZhUJ9uehJ4g@mail.gmail.com> <76c11791-b314-0c58-558f-c49d68a84d52@shanecurcuru.org> <CA+ULb+vGDDAkDZEG-01j7FRZwtPW6Q144moeqigDziFhjY7i7g@mail.gmail.com> <845456266.67759.1464308450123.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <CADmm+Ke8q_wZLTGQrmSHCa1ySMu8y1ad3xC6hpeZ4=c7exQWvg@mail.gmail.com> <BAC3A200-AD7E-4D17-847E-B2146395B1F7@yahoo.com> <02316F29-AF1C-413C-AF04-DD19DA4D7042@yahoo.com> <CY1PR03MB2346F5E1F42C8BBF6EF2EFA699440@CY1PR03MB2346.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <8B9B06BF-2234-4369-AE7B-AA877C1C5137@yahoo.com> <CY1PR03MB2346C0D9F81972051E77B71599440@CY1PR03MB2346.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CY1PR03MB2346C6B61953AEEA42248DB799440@CY1PR03MB2346.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <4a11b30f-ec7b-f3a1-a566-e8971121194c@apache.org> <CY1PR03MB2346171AE3EB02C567A3A31299450@CY1PR03MB2346.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <76957362-e51e-90bb-04a6-81a5cc3a3c97@apache.org> <CA+ULb+tTwHXrPbUDe5fpA=7Uj8S8rQRC-UFnKeK47RSJJNarwA@mail.gma
 il.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+ULb+tTwHXrPbUDe5fpA=7Uj8S8rQRC-UFnKeK47RSJJNarwA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@community.apache.org
archived-at: Tue, 31 May 2016 23:17:36 -0000

As others have said Roman, including Ross,  it is neither likely to be used n=
or necessary to cleave a boundary between volunteers and Ross, but in the in=
terests of keeping the peace I'm willing to compromise.
Your patch is ok with me.

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 31, 2016, at 2:27 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org> wrote=
:
>=20
>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Mark Thomas <markt@apache.org> wrote:
>>> On 30/05/2016 18:30, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>> Yes. Thanks to everyone working this out.
>>=20
>> Done. Thanks Marvin.
>=20
> Good progress. Would an additional patch attached bellow be acceptable?
>    https://paste.apache.org/FAVL
>=20
> I said it once and I'll say it again, but perhaps better yet -- I'll just q=
uote
> Ross to make sure that my *intent* does't get misinterpreted and/or
> questioned by Joe again.
>=20
> "My only concern is that there needs to be a single channel for
> official complaints. That should remain President (at least while the
> sitting President is willing to take on that responsibility)."
>=20
> This is my very strong concern as to how the current text of CoC reads.
>=20
> Thanks,
> Roman.