community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roman Shaposhnik <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: ombudsman@ (was Encouraging More Women to Participate on Apache Projects?)
Date Thu, 26 May 2016 15:49:37 GMT
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Joe Schaefer
> <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>> Patch looks pretty straightforward Marvin.
>
> It may very well be. In fact, if it looks so straightforward you should be able
> to provide a diff in no time at all. Please do so at your earliest convenience.

Several folks pointed out: https://paste.apache.org/3AuO to me which I missed.
Apologies for that.

Now that I'm looking at the modification I'm very, very strongly -1 on
it. Like I said,
having a group of volunteers is fine as an intermediate step of
handling the concern.
The ultimate escalation channel has to be a single officer appointed
by the board.

Only having president@ there as an escalation channel gives me the needed level
of comfort to stand behind our CoC and be confident that even those
wishing ultimate
anonymity and bringing us highest level of concerns from the point of
view of how it
may backfire on the individual can be accommodated.

During the good times we all feel like we're one big happy family and
why the heck
won't we all get along and trust each other. But CoC and its
escalation policy is
NOT written for those times.

For more on why this is a much more involved subject I highly
recommend reading this:
    http://www.amazon.com/Bravehearts-Whistle-Blowing-Snowden-Mark-Hertsgaard/dp/1510703373

One again, to recap:

-1

Thanks,
Roman.

Mime
View raw message