Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D23818AB5 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39102 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2015 17:22:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 38778 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2015 17:22:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 38766 invoked by uid 99); 21 Oct 2015 17:22:09 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:22:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id EB0871A2A01 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:22:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.501 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.501 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, KAM_LINKBAIT=2.5, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GyjXOMEs8K6h for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:21:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-f44.google.com (mail-qg0-f44.google.com [209.85.192.44]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 915BF20750 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qgad10 with SMTP id d10so33320270qga.3 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:21:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7pe7KUE/sFh5IjVuAdZkHKGKr8coHu2Acvz4kux3oMc=; b=hkRtPrYQv8lQ5+4639DQwyg32Ps2u2ziUUKSK1I5tCc7Y9We3NZ5LhhIX3Q3sMXJUw 9B6JqYFCQx8tMXOuNpC/V8sRJcdFPiu8mrXyUncBECRXmE2h8PPjWmcBBuluxQBqjk4z yPYjIwuL/egJR8ykxn2PTjwxQPfcHlSxWqGcS4U9M7hhKWkQugmUchgMo23NasZlM6DX nzj0OwqqbIz/vLbyUw/DeJZAuPSAOB1f9UVaQimo5XS5nbPJBo5f2zSu8mmvC+LTpFFp oPY9GSSmecc48GKC6nAUoqqBfpaBAA9tSlPm+s1+FwPjROx6iezAFaW+iz2QIOL/Ldpm UZRw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmKths26jUtYg0ypH6xt80clohK3R8SfvbR5elu4DyQV3EegFjcm6OGN80sBkzZR1Ux6mRh X-Received: by 10.140.42.166 with SMTP id c35mr1286086qga.66.1445448110049; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:21:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (nat-pool-rdu-u.redhat.com. [66.187.233.203]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h198sm3598953qhc.47.2015.10.21.10.21.48 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:21:48 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [reporter] Confusing PMC/Committeer/Committee/LDAP report format To: dev@community.apache.org References: <56213FE0.5080009@rcbowen.com> <4064173.zJHRxZPbYq@herve-desktop> <4606062.upZOIfjGNv@herve-desktop> <5626A2AD.50206@rcbowen.com> From: Rich Bowen Message-ID: <5627C9AA.1050707@rcbowen.com> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:21:46 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/20/2015 06:22 PM, sebb wrote: >> >My change was because the phrasing of the reports is confusing. The >> >'committee group' phrasing trips me up every single time. The information in > What else should it be called? > It's not the same as the PMC. > Sure, it is. If it's not, then something is broken, right? I'm not a fan of documenting breakage. -- Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon