community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [reporter] Confusing PMC/Committeer/Committee/LDAP report format
Date Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:17:45 GMT
On 21 October 2015 at 18:21, Rich Bowen <rbowen@rcbowen.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 10/20/2015 06:22 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>> >My change was because the phrasing of the reports is confusing. The
>>> >'committee group' phrasing trips me up every single time. The
>>> > information in
>>
>> What else should it be called?
>> It's not the same as the PMC.
>>
>
> Sure, it is. If it's not, then something is broken, right? I'm not a fan of
> documenting breakage.

Sorry, but they are not the same, and discrepancies are not
necessarily breakage.

The LDAP group is used for granting karma, not for determining PMC membership.

I can see that it might sometimes be necessary for karma to be granted
to non-PMC members and vice-versa.

In fact we had a case in the last year or two where a PMC member asked
to be removed from the LDAP group for a short while.
He was still a PMC member, but was not in the LDAP group.

>
> --
> Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
> http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon

Mime
View raw message