Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 603C218592 for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53724 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2015 15:39:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 53422 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2015 15:39:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 53410 invoked by uid 99); 26 Sep 2015 15:39:53 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:39:53 +0000 Received: from zulu.23.e-reka.si (cpe-62-84-228-69.dynamic.amis.net [62.84.228.69]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id B0B091A025E for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:39:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Overlapping role descriptions To: dev@community.apache.org References: <56069F21.1060701@apache.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Branko_=c4=8cibej?= Organization: The Apache Software Foundation Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAADBQTFRF IhsbCy0qZjoVOVRoeFxSAIKBzXQiAKaibYiewnk7nn9z0qCTgL3i87Ep6Kx/+tHBsrE+zgAAAjZJ REFUOMvF0jFoE1EYB/CzjWlqIzaTjqVIBifRRWyG0t5iUqlLyFpCeXBgKg5yq6A4degUDJjoUDpc 1Qt4Ux94B11SOLB0KGS4discpbkORTCn9/m9d3fvLhXnvuHu3f+Xx/veyyfZfLSdZHzgicSfeyw4 JISwdz8FT6M8lM8Ceg385Dlhs+cC9sQCDn0B78QCogzwN+sxfHGOIXBbRGkNAM4cZymGtgNsDPgz cByxon3EEm1TLmvAlghoHOO3CZSa+IQ/vF6JV8tgKOMow78gRgL2/+EIvATOUtB3SSdMg4GXgrbn uk0uLiGdoCHKbX4E+t1FUTqn1AtIdPJebssDQ64YANSQyyaQNyUOFs0ijMsMFnOPTahPLXKYowtY 08MfCP7vR7hRnc5zmPK7CDYYbHcbC7tHuyFA94U/1LYZaJpu/sxACHMwvwZljTLY0TbNk4x+zuEt yC3MfCM6uSIvfwur0itFL4FA2Yal8BzLfnYV4EIGwEPAk7o5zIcnvzHMEjwJrrhAKK7on6IrsfRJ 7A53BhaK+CL7fj6+q/sPeOvcDTtoZTxpUYsFeIknrOXep3p3l7Ua+8sZ5FPQKyKwWi+DfROTU7ny C1/9UhpeY7K287WJCzbsNPQm2S6Yk4PSCNhWM2r3nD0K9liYb6yPgCRJhSzPrxUK0yUBVk1VX0lj s7MzGZyp0wImMK/e8rHbz2soL+O+2r1dxfGsAmBcx0lNjS/RUhlUC7gRn1wGMdQ7Vw1/AReW/RN3 xFWdAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Message-ID: <5606BC45.7020001@apache.org> Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 17:39:49 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 26.09.2015 16:16, Pierre Smits wrote: > Branko, > > I am not talking about walls, only about removing confusion from > definitions. The question that I keep repeating that you haven't answered is: whose confusion? Can you show that people are actually confused by our current definitions? Are *you* confused by them? > A contributor can be user, as much as he/she can choose not to > be a user. Similarly, a developer of project A contributing (in whatever > form) to project B can be someone who doesn't use (benefits from) the works > of project B. > > I never mentioned that a user can't be a contributor. Maybe you should read > my suggestions again. > The distinctions I made were: > > - user = person or organisation benefiting from the works of the project > .... > - contributor = person contributing ... > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > *OFBiz Extensions Marketplace* > http://oem.ofbizci.net > > On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > >> On 26.09.2015 14:45, Pierre Smits wrote: >>> It is all about removing potential confusion and sending clear messages. >>> >>> *re: user* >>> A user benefits from the contributions. He/she or them (the organisation) >>> can happily do so without ever interacting with a projects community. >> They >>> may even be a subscriber to any or all mailing lists of the ASF without >>> ever posting anything to a mailing list. They may also enhance the works >> of >>> a project without sharing it with the project. Hence the part about users >>> contributing should removed from the definition. >> You've not said *why* you think that users can't be contributors. That's >> totally at odds with the inclusive communities we're trying to build >> here. A developer can also be a user, a user can also be a contributor. >> The roles *do* overlap and that's what the current definitions describe. >> Which of course does not meant that they *have* to overlap in any >> particular case. >> >> It ain't broken so don't try to fix it. You're the first person I've >> ever heard of who thinks there should be a wall between users and >> developers. >> >> -- Brane >> >>