community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Raul Kripalani <ra...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Moving Apache Extras
Date Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:43:50 GMT
At Apache Camel we use camel-extras to host Camel components/modules that
depend on 3rd party dependencies that are incompatible with ASLv2.

After briefly discussing with some committers / contributors on our mailing
lists, I get the impression that most folks would prefer to migrate
camel-extras to Github rather than SF. Since enabling the ASF Camel Github
mirror, we have processed 600+ pull requests and I'd venture a guess that
our generous contributors prefer the Github model for collaborating. In
fact, some of our most engaged camel-extras committers have expressed their
dislike for SF – so imposing SF to camel-extras will be like delivering a
deathblow to the project, as we'll be risking losing those contributors.

Therefore, my question is: are projects obliged to host their extras on the
ASF's selected platform (Sourceforge)? By reading [1] my conclusion is
'no', as extras projects don't belong to the ASF nor do they have to follow
the ASF organisational model or policies. I'm pretty sure that a VOTE on
our list would yield Github as the preferred new home.

[1] https://community.apache.org/apache-extras/faq.html

Thanks,

*Raúl Kripalani*
Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source
Integration specialist
http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Victor NOËL <victor.noel@linagora.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I come in a bit late on the discussion (I hope I won't break the mail
> threading, I don't have a message to answer to…).
> We were discussing the subject on camel-users and I was wondering if you
> were aware of the very problematic behaviour of SourceForge?
>
> I am referring to the following story with the Gimp project:
>
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/08/gimp_dumps_sourceforge_over_dodgy_ads_and_installer/
>
> Basically, they started putting adware and spyware in installers of
> opensource projects without their consent.
> After Gimp removed themselves from SourceForge, they continued by
> impersonating them, see:
>
> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2015-May/msg00097.html
> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2015-May/msg00098.html
>
> Do we really want apache extra to be hosted by an organisation like that?
>
> Just my 2cents… sorry for arriving so late in the discussion.
>
> Victor
> --
>
>
> Vous utilisez la version libre et gratuite d'OBM, développée et supportée
> par Linagora.
> Contribuez à la R&D du produit en souscrivant à une offre entreprise.
> http://pro.obm.org/ - http://www.linagora.com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message