Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1F9518F73 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 04:43:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70015 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2015 04:43:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 69726 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2015 04:43:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 69707 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2015 04:43:15 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 04:43:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A81DF19D8CF for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 04:43:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.9 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XicegGLLrChD for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 04:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f42.google.com (mail-la0-f42.google.com [209.85.215.42]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id A68AC428DC for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 04:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lagz9 with SMTP id z9so15445761lag.3 for ; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 21:43:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=9AAtByvohp/DyOiBp359hWtdO3/VjLww5yKf+Totr9s=; b=pO4owVQP6/VAGx3CEGIJYLncbDjQ6ixjvQ9bsqu6J8jo2sgU42JRTZ71P+X1qP0uBg UBWGmzTk6v8dBTI2JQfgo8di8O7IuoZ3OM5ggsnNtWfNvl2IBSjaxKRGr7/+QrMrtQQ/ YMjTDiDjO/nxo61iylflZgfC5q0igEEDq+zFraGRURI8AlCpTndbxU0l++EjzmhfoCGH iigMVIa4hVl/axzEHHRd4ACbWz7ov5Vfa1xkRFBLxupzEb/etdUJE9O/81bCHANMd8HN Amos9KYjxCKB96Xlwxml2UOzp9IEj59sg/Wjnxb9j+3AwVx52MVpiW9wU/QCgRhcF8CE RPHw== X-Received: by 10.152.25.169 with SMTP id d9mr5703038lag.80.1438922581583; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 21:43:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <0A45B62D-00FA-4F66-B357-E0240F9E65A1@gmail.com> <2D917661-36A3-4C49-93F2-2FE06F097437@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Santiago Gala Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 04:42:52 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: slack To: "dev@community.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158b20255ad90051cb145dc --089e0158b20255ad90051cb145dc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm also using slack for work in my new company. It makes sense for us as a lot of the activities imply real-time synchronization between members of teams spread around the world. But as part of my job is to enhance the community supporting tools, I'm finding that slack is useful, but, as previously said, tends to fuzzy decision making and documentation, something that does not bode well with repeatable processes and knowledge consolidation. Search is limited 10k last messages for the free teams, so I'd recommend that if projects want to use it we look for a (donated or paid) comprehensive plan. That one of the key features they charge for is full searchability says it all about how important knowledge consolidation is in the contexto of collaboration... El vie., 7 ago. 2015 a las 0:02, Ted Dunning () escribi=C3=B3: > I use slack for work. The Apache Mahout project has been using it as wel= l. > > There is a huge danger of off-list discussions that go unreported (as wit= h > IRC, but seemingly more so because of a better interface and easier acces= s > to one-on-one conversations). The problem is not the tool itself or the > people, it is just the social drift that happens and which must be > forcefully counter-acted. > > > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Achim Nierbeck > wrote: > > > Same here using slack at work and irc for apache chats > > > > Regards, Achim > > > > sent from mobile device > > Am 06.08.2015 9:33 nachm. schrieb : > > > > > I use Slack at work, but favor the openness of IRC for everything els= e. > > > > > > Mo > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > > On Aug 6, 2015, at 1:57 PM, Peter Hunsberger < > > peter.hunsberger@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Outside of Apache, the NEO4J project uses Slack. It seems pretty > > active > > > > with a pretty global user base. > > > > > > > > Peter Hunsberger > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Louis Su=C3=A1rez-Potts < > luispo@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi, > > > >> I=E2=80=99m curious who here also uses Slack. Besides me, that is. > > > >> > > > >> One thing I=E2=80=99m interested in is, How global is its reach? > > > >> > > > >> -louis > > > > > > --089e0158b20255ad90051cb145dc--