Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AB5018EB5 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 19:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98510 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2015 19:06:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 98187 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2015 19:06:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 98173 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2015 19:06:02 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 19:06:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 20614DB04F for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 19:06:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.149 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.149 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rSjzquePAF93 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 19:05:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-f49.google.com (mail-qg0-f49.google.com [209.85.192.49]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 00F2B24DBC for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 19:05:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qged69 with SMTP id d69so59858814qge.0 for ; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 12:05:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=I5PICSYQPbGeDlE2o573XP5eAa8h62TlouO22BS4MD8=; b=I1zV/FbNCZxcO7OYZyeNySSqbfWdCfEy+ffEeDLu6fAUY5rMrtadQv5NxAPrp7pASZ vHPHsk2MjuotB/fMPU/vIlcIKbR0+zsgxk4OCp8LKgSNbyFZeiT65O4ZiHtZmF1tIlvy UEk8Ial9lJkGiIVrZV6Atj7xibHXQq/N91VojR+liM/T2Cw0kJxdM89uhEENpaWLBaXT fSK0xQbE8K/Ev3y+XRk2qmzGdaqjyEdehQ69Qbh4BLuhkJkiWP/uL3Xx9CgmIW+22MaH xG9G9CjwcGIad4JGZgF+ODHD+eKCjl3lmQAVI6QnUVYWRTJVoLjvg3QZNNCXFJrCxu8s tB9g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.128.65 with SMTP id 62mr6438958qha.8.1438887909213; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 12:05:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.109.98 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:05:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.109.98 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:05:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:05:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apache ICLA Question From: Eduardo Enocia To: dev@community.apache.org Cc: "Williams, Kiana" , "secretary@apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134ef5ab34ada051ca932bf --001a1134ef5ab34ada051ca932bf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Feedback On Aug 7, 2015 12:18 AM, "Presley, Karen D" wrote: > Hello, > > My Agency has several developers that plan to contribute to an Apache > project. We noticed the requirement for an ICLA to be signed by each > contributor, yet these developers do not have the authority to grant patent > or copyright licenses on behalf of the government. As an alternate > solution, is it acceptable for the person who has the authority to grant > these IP rights sign an ICLA on behalf of all developers which, thereby > listing all government contributors? > > Thanks in advance for your assistance, > > > Karen > > > > > --001a1134ef5ab34ada051ca932bf--