Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALhtWkfK-yFR_q=3+6z5L_t6ggDTqANdLhZJxbFderxvd_XyyQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <0A45B62D-00FA-4F66-B357-E0240F9E65A1@gmail.com>
	<55C484B5.8000504@spielviel.de>
	<86B34B78-B3F6-4DE7-AD71-325272BA3C17@gmail.com>
	<CALhtWkc=C89sOcA9pn4vPxaLd68v6Nc8zjCXYFAjTJsHauuKtA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACVCA=cjn_LO8YaRR3ta3phsBUihGBXM0eV_hChG40VnHm4HZQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEWfVJm9QC6tUuKKVv56NmkVL0MDRZyjt3K6KF5NVMVU1DJ-Kg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+ULb+v4v+UZrP3ZBZnxQkGBAcosPksn+CCi_=pyfcJpax5y9Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<00A12D1F-16AE-4798-B274-5D22B3E5D891@gmail.com>
	<CAFjJE53jx8XV_C=9R+fQ8H-GnhBTFo0-eyQ-kqcLZB6389XmgA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALhtWkfK-yFR_q=3+6z5L_t6ggDTqANdLhZJxbFderxvd_XyyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 01:36:25 +0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAFjJE50m70Hn1JhbkLMHWjtPnBbF-wO0iZ2-Z96dG5tn5rb76g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: slack
From: =?UTF-8?B?5p6X5pmJ5qif?= <line0928769960@gmail.com>
To: dev@community.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7ba97436c154bc051cf86c15

--047d7ba97436c154bc051cf86c15
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2015/8/11 =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=881:35=E6=96=BC "Benson Margulies" <bimargulies@g=
mail.com>=E5=AF=AB=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
>
> I think it's important to recognize how the board and the foundation
> have handled this issue over time.
>
> The absolute requirement is open decision-making. Avoiding real-time
> communications avoids many possible failures of open decision-making.
> (Not, of course, all.) After all, the simplest primrose path here is
> two people standing at the intersection of their cubicles. The policy
> has always been to sternly warn that the use of real time mechanisms
> involves risks of failure, and that failure involves risks of the
> board's blunt instruments being deployed. Does all of this slow down
> some processes, and cause some people of limited patience / boundless
> energy to get frustrated? Yup, things have costs.
>
> Just writing up the results on the mailing list isn't good enough if
> there is no real opportunity for people to question, deliberate, and
> change the course of action.
>
> You want to have a bar camp, a con call, a slack discussion, a set of
> messages exchanged by carrier pigeon? Then it's up to you to make sure
> that you don't end up excluding people from the decision-making
> process.

--047d7ba97436c154bc051cf86c15--