community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Franco Perruna <francoperrun...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Ripple Release 0.9.32
Date Sun, 23 Aug 2015 21:48:57 GMT
Dankeschön
Am 23.08.2015 11:45 nachm. schrieb "sebb" <sebbaz@gmail.com>:

> Wrong list.
>
> The message needs to go to general@incubator.apache.org
>
> On 23 August 2015 at 22:41, Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > +1 binding
> >
> > I checked:
> > - signatures and hashed good
> > - filename contains incubating
> > - DISCLAIMER exits
> > - LICENSE and NOTICE good
> > - no unexpected binaries
> > - all source files have headers
> >
> > I did’t have an environment set that could compile the project. Would be
> nice to have pointer on how to set up “jake".
> >
> > What's the provanance of these two files? I notice the first can be
> found here [1]
> > ripple-emulator-0.9.32-incubating/thirdparty/dredd.txt
> > ripple-emulator-0.9.32-incubating/thirdparty/fail.txt
> >
> > The header on lib/client/platform/webworks.core/2.0.0/client/utils.js is
> probably a little misleading as it contains a mix of licensed code, but not
> sure if any changes are required.
> >
> > There’s no need (but no issue) for Rico or XMLHttpRequest.js to be
> included in LICENSE as they Apache licensed. [2]
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
> > 1. http://www.retrojunkie.com/asciiart/tvmovies/dredd.htm
> > 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message