Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AB3A18242 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 08:07:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98343 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2015 08:07:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 97997 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2015 08:07:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 97984 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2015 08:07:55 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 08:07:55 +0000 Received: from auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com (auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.228]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id A8C511A0149 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 08:07:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649E120B87 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 04:07:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web5 ([10.202.2.215]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 04:07:53 -0400 Received: by web5.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 3C70EA7AB8C; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 04:07:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1437034073.326568.325119785.5AFD95FC@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: O9CFKvy5w7J85FsbJvB9Rjn5UFgP+/hOvOYDLrTahPur 1437034073 From: Tony Stevenson To: dev@community.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-63a5d8c6 In-Reply-To: References: <55A3ECDA.20402@rcbowen.com> <55A3FF06.5070304@apache.org> <55A4B4E0.1060208@apache.org> <55A6CFB1.1020403@apache.org> Subject: Re: FOSDEM Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:07:53 +0100 Page now showing here - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/FOSDEM+2015 -- Many thanks, Tony On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, at 01:38 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > This is turning into quite a long thread ;-) Shall we start a wiki > page to coordinate all the FOSDEM activities (same way > we do for ApacheCON)? > > I don't seem to have enough karma to start a new page on ComDev > wiki, but I can surely contribute if somebody at least starts a page. > > Any takers? > > Thanks, > Roman. > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Andrea Pescetti > wrote: > > On 15/07/2015 jan i wrote: > >> > >> On 14 July 2015 at 09:06, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >>> > >>> On 13/07/2015 jan i wrote: > >>>> > >>>> who takes lead on keeping an eye on the FOSDEM team? > >>> > >>> I usually monitor that, and I can notify this list too this year (even > >>> though now is way too early for me to have any ideas about my possible > >>> commitment to an OpenOffice and/or and Apache presence). > >>> > >> thanks a lot for volunteering to help keep a finger on the pulse. > >> It might be that you do not have any idea about the AOO presence, but it > >> seems I am in a more lucky position > > > > > > Well, it seems I didn't write it in a clear way. My quote above should mean > > something like "I have no idea if I will be at FOSDEM", not "I have no idea > > if OpenOffice/Apache will be at FOSDEM". I doubt that could be > > misunderstood, but with a lot of mails misunderstandings just happen and are > > not a big issue. > > > >>> For reference: last year the call was mid-September with a deadline of > >>> mid-November and the conference was in late January like this year. > >> > >> The dates I have been told are saturday 30 january 2016 to sunday 31 > >> january 2016. > > > > > > These are the official dates, sure. I wanted to say (and here I admit I > > wrote it in a confusing way!): FOSDEM 2016 will be more or less in the same > > period as FOSDEM 2015. For FOSDEM 2015 calls were sent out mid-September > > 2014 with a deadline in mid-November 2014. It is reasonable to expect a > > similar timeline this year. > > > >> - AOO traditionally has a double table on the first floor, I would would > >> like (as ASF and AOO) to get 4 tables in the ground floor. > > > > > > It would be great to have both, not at the expense of visibility though. I > > would suggest to wait for the call and read it before exploring > > possibilities. I'm much in favor of an Apache presence. I don't know if one > > can ask for a specific floor... but again, reading the call can probably > > help a lot! > > > >> - if we have enough projects, we can try and make a Apache dev.room (AOO > >> might prefer to be in open editors room). Is it ok if I write to all PMCS > >> asking for interest ? > > > > > > I tend to think like Rich on this: a "virtual" track would be very smart > > (i.e., we --oops, I am already assuming I will be at FOSDEM!-- have a poster > > at the booth where we highlight all Apache-related talks), but these talks > > happen in different devrooms, since the devrooms are not arranged by > > Foundation but by topic. > > > >> - Which message to do we want to bring across ? just that we exist or more > >> ? > > > > > > More! > > > >> - Is the booth a place for people to join Apache, or just a "we exist, go > >> and look us up" ? > > > > > > It is a developer conference. I would consider it a success if developers > > who visit the booth consider putting their "reasonably serious" projects in > > the Incubator and have a good understanding of the advantages this brings. > > > >> Please if somebody feel I bully by taking lead, please tell me > > > > > > Come on... You are welcome to do so! Simply, I can't take commitments since > > at this moment late January 2016 is off the radar for me (to be clear, I > > want to say: it's too early for me to know whether I will be in Brussels at > > FOSDEM in late January 2016). > > > > Regards, > > Andrea.