community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Incubating, Graduating & Code of conduct @ The ASF (spin-off of Better specifying....)
Date Mon, 06 Jul 2015 10:37:31 GMT
And you can read 'determination' as well as 'perception'.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Pierre Smits <pierre.smits@gmail.com> wrote:

> Like expressed earlier, that loosely way of interpreting ASF guidelines
> has led to the situation that the board charges newly established projects
> to define its bylaws. Charges that are then disregarded by the project and
> not followed up on by the board and or the appointed VP of the project.
>
> It is such that makes the determination of 'doing the right thing, doing
> it the right way' less credible in stead of more. The show flake falling
> down at the top of the mountain creates the avalanche in the valley.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
> Services & Solutions for Cloud-
> Based Manufacturing, Professional
> Services and Retail & Trade
> http://www.orrtiz.com
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Pierre Smits <pierre.smits@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > ...The latest posting by Jan proves the point of the necessity of good
>> > per-project bylaws when it comes to deviating from the generic
>> guidelines
>> > of the ASF...
>>
>> But as others have said, the best is to stick to those guidelines and
>> use the default bylaws, unless it's absolutely necessary to do things
>> differently.
>>
>> -Bertrand
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message