community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: LABS a top level project of the ASF? (Was: Re: Incubating, ....)
Date Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:27:16 GMT
Or stopping it.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Pierre Smits <pierre.smits@gmail.com> wrote:

> @jani,
>
> Actually, I don't feel that need as (at least) Tim and you do. But I am
> sure that, you and your peers can find perfect validating reasons for
> having this service around (or considering it a TLP) when discussing such
> and more amongst yourselves.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
> Services & Solutions for Cloud-
> Based Manufacturing, Professional
> Services and Retail & Trade
> http://www.orrtiz.com
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 4:10 PM, jan i <jani@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 6 July 2015 at 15:00, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > ...I'd say this is the wrong place to have this particular discussion.
>> > > The courteous thing to do is to have a project specific discussion on
>> > > the project's specific list....
>> >
>> > Agreed, that's what I meant to say, comdev has no business discussing
>> > the validity of the labs project unless that discussion is started by
>> > the labs PMC.
>> >
>> +1 as both LABS and ComDEV PMC I totally agree. I gave the project name
>> because it
>> seemed correct to answer Sebb, not to start a discussion about LABS.
>>
>> Pierre@ feel welcome to take this discussion to our mailing list
>> labs@labs.apache.org over
>> there I will be more than happy to discuss whether or not LABS is a real
>> TLP.
>>
>> looking forward to the discussion.
>> rgds
>> jan i.
>>
>>
>> > -Bertrand
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message