community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bkrm Adhikari <>
Subject Re: Better specifying the scope of our Code of Conduct
Date Wed, 01 Jul 2015 01:06:40 GMT
Yes sure

Rich Bowen <> wrote:

>On 06/30/2015 07:23 AM, jan i wrote:
>> Maybe I am a bad reader, but I read it as apacheCON CORE is not covered and
>> surely apache big data
>> (which is a "pure" LF managed event), because the space is managed by LF. I
>> would like to see it "applied to"
>> and not only "expect to be honered" for  all apache events including
>> apacheCON.
>LF has a code of conduct. It's shorter than ours, and probably more 
>easily enforceable because it covers a very limited time and space, 
>whereas ours covers the known universe and all time.
>If someone behaves badly at ApacheCon, we (actually, LF) can throw them 
>out the door and ask them not to come back next time.
>If someone behaves badly at the ASF, how do we enforce? This is yet to 
>be determined.
>If you wish to apply our CoC to ApacheCon, we need to be very clear with 
>LF as to what that means, specifically, and we also need to take 
>responsibility for that enforcement. As it stands now, we rely on LF to 
>enforce their CoC, when we report incidents to them. I'm not actually 
>sure we want to take that over from them, but it's certainly worth 
>Rich Bowen - - @rbowen
> - @apachecon
View raw message