Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
To: dev@community.apache.org, "James Carman" <james@carmanconsulting.com>
Subject: Re: Reg -Join Community
References: 
 <CACRJJHTLXEpXnf_eJiu1AnBssw=j2FkWejKZp7hzdc4Rz4m+qw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALznzY4MvW=fCH2KkOZGiFqx2724vbD_98oT9LTd-=t7f8nErw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 14:49:24 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo" <thiagohp@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <op.xymzsmsiovlrp5@arsmachina>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALznzY4MvW=fCH2KkOZGiFqx2724vbD_98oT9LTd-=t7f8nErw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux)

On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:12:12 -0300, James Carman  
<james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:

> How does this framework compare with the standards-based JavaBean
> validation from work?

Yep, JSRs 303 (Bean Validation 1.0) and 349 (Bean Validation 1.1).

> On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 5:03 AM Karthik Rajendran <karthikrmk@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>   Hi All,
>>
>>       I created java based bean validation .The bean validation will  
>> work
>> as generic based API.The api will validate the pattern matches and not
>> null, empty. i would like to submit this API to Your community .please
>> guide me
>> Right now i am working as associate of projects at MNC
>>
>> Features:
>> 1.Annotation based validation
>> 2.Generic based Validation
>> 3.Pattern Matches validation
>> 4.Business Model class validation
>>
>> Under going projects
>>
>> 1. Run time Exception Capture by Auto
>>
>>
>> Regars,
>> karthik.R
>> Java Associate of Projects
>> Chennai
>> india
>>


-- 
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
http://machina.com.br