community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Reich <stefan.reich.maker.of....@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Integrating JavaX
Date Fri, 08 May 2015 17:27:11 GMT
Nice :) I didn't get that before, sorry. Will do!

Stefan
Am 08.05.2015 19:00 schrieb "Konstantin Boudnik" <cos@apache.org>:

> Stefan,
>
> As Thiago suggested, you can move this conversation to
> general@incubator.apache.org: there's a bunch of people who are helping
> new
> projects to get into ASF and up to speed on a daily basis.
>
> I, for one, will keep an eye on your email and will chime in as soon as it
> arrives ;)
>
> Good luck!
>   Cos
>
> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 06:41PM, Stefan Reich wrote:
> > Nice! I'll make it a tech spike.
> >
> > Now we should move this discussion somewhere else I guess (sorry for
> > posting to the list, Mike - I need attention :). Just where?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Am 08.05.2015 17:34 schrieb "Mike Kienenberger" <mkienenb@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > javaX definitely looks interesting.
> > >
> > > I've always wished Java supported named parameter methods like
> Objective-C.
> > >
> > > drawCircleWithRadius:r atX:x y:y;
> > >  instead of
> > > drawCircle(r, x, y);
> > >
> > > I suppose that would conflict with the conditional expression operator
> > > (b ? t : f) but maybe two colons
> > >
> > > drawCircleWithRadius::r atX::x y::y;
> > >
> > > Of course, without the smalltalk-esque grouping brackets, maybe it'd
> > > be too hard to read and parse it in java.   Guess the idea would need
> > > more work.
> > >
> > > [renderer drawCircleWithRadius:r atX:[radiusSource xBasedOnInputA:a
> b:b]
> > > y:y];
> > > versus
> > > renderer.drawCircleWithRadiusAtXandY(r,
> > > radiusSource.xBasedOnInputAandB(a, b), y);
> > >
> > > doesn't really work as
> > >
> > > renderer.drawCircleWithRadius::r atX::radiusSource.xBasedOnInputA::a
> b::b
> > > y::y;
> > >
> > > Maybe with extra parens...
> > >
> > > renderer.(drawCircleWithRadius::r atX::radiusSource.(xBasedOnInputA::a
> > > b::b) y::y);
> > >
> > > but at this point, it stops having the same readability....
> > >
> > > Guess we really need objective C method call syntax for java :)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
> > > <thiagohp@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 08 May 2015 09:18:10 -0300, Stefan Reich
> > > > <stefan.reich.maker.of.eye@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > >> I'd like to find a home (or home-s) for the "JavaX" project (
> > > >> http://javax.tinybrain.de).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Taking a look . . . :)
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> JavaX is a super-extensible version of Java.
> > > >>
> > > >> It's probably the easiest way to extend any language existing right
> now.
> > > >>
> > > >> Is there a way to collaborate with Apache? I think I can promise you
> > > that
> > > >> this is the way of the future :-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I believe the incubator is the place to start:
> > > http://incubator.apache.org/
> > > > "The Incubator project is the entry path into The Apache Software
> > > Foundation
> > > > (ASF) for projects and codebases wishing to become part of the
> > > Foundation's
> > > > efforts. All code donations from external organisations and existing
> > > > external projects wishing to join Apache enter through the
> Incubator."
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> > > > Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
> > > > http://machina.com.br
> > >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message