community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christian Müller <christian.muel...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016
Date Mon, 20 Apr 2015 04:55:56 GMT
Most/All Camel Extra committers/contributors would like to move to GitHub
and consider SF as "dead end" and not "state of the art".

Best,
Christian


On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <
krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Should all *-extra projects from Apache Extra move together to the new
> home or can each project choose separately the
> new home?
>
> Regards
> Krzysztof
>
> On 12.03.2015 22:37, David Nalley wrote:
> > It is my understanding that moving to SF from Google Code is a ComDev
> > decision. I have interacted with SF and then brought the PoCs they've
> > done here, but AFAIK, no decision has been made.
> >
> > --David
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
> > <Ross.Gardler@microsoft.com> wrote:
> >> Ahhh... I see no that's just code for I don't have time, but these
> folks have shown interest ;-)
> >>
> >> I'm happy to help make sure we hit this deadline, but I'm not driving
> it.
> >>
> >> Ross
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Ulrich Stärk [mailto:uli@spielviel.de]
> >> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 1:50 PM
> >> To: dev@community.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016
> >>
> >> *Really* moving board@ to BCC ;)
> >>
> >> You said you put people in contact with each other so I was under the
> impression you were actively part of a group driving this.
> >>
> >> Jim, do you have any updates on the current status?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Uli
> >>
> >> On 2015-03-12 21:40, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
> >>> Moving board@ to BCC
> >>>
> >>> I am *not* working on it. I have no idea who said I was (I do hope it
> >>> wasn't me!)
> >>>
> >>> All I know is that Jim, David and Roberto are working on it, I don't
> >>> know how actively but it is now a priority.
> >>>
> >>> I believe Jim is involved wearing his ComDev hat so (with his
> >>> agreement) you can look to him for those updates. David is wearing his
> infra hat and Roberto wears his SF hat.
> >>>
> >>> Ross
> >>>
> >>> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft
> >>> Corporation
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message----- From: Ulrich Stärk
> >>> [mailto:uli@spielviel.de] Sent: Thursday, March 12,
> >>> 2015 1:36 PM To: dev@community.apache.org Cc: board@apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016
> >>>
> >>> We reported about apache extras in September and November and both
> >>> times we were told that Jim, Ross, David and Roberto were working on
> >>> it. Some time in October David asked for feedback on a proof of
> concept, no news since then.
> >>>
> >>> Can you shed some light on who is driving this atm?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Uli
> >>>
> >>> On 2015-03-12 21:22, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
> >>>> Today Google announced that Google Code will be shutting down Jan 25,
> 2016.
> >>>>
> >>>> We need to create a replacement for Apache-extras. Can we please make
> >>>> sure that progress on this is reported in the ComDev board report
> each quarter.
> >>>>
> >>>> I suggest the starting point should be to expand discussions with
> >>>> SourceForge, they have offered neighborhoods in the past. David, with
> >>>> his infra hat, has been exploring options for download provision
> already (I'm not sure of the current status).
> >>>>
> >>>> (and as a reminder, this is why we don't like to use services
> >>>> provided by external companies)
> >>>>
> >>>> Ross
> >>>>
> >>>> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft
> >>>> Corporation
> >>>>
> >>>>
>
> --
> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>
> JEE & OSS Architect
> Apache Software Foundation Member
> Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer & PMC chair
> Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC <
> http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/en/>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message