community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Proposing tracks for ACEU15
Date Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:34:43 GMT
Great. Thanks for clarifying.

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <
Ross.Gardler@microsoft.com> wrote:

> We is the ASF.
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ________________________________
> From: Pierre Smits<mailto:pierre.smits@gmail.com>
> Sent: ‎4/‎20/‎2015 8:28 AM
> To: dev@community.apache.org<mailto:dev@community.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Proposing tracks for ACEU15
>
> Quoting: '*we* do not have to ask it. The LF do'  But that 'we' is
> confusing. Who is that? You? I? The coordinator? The Board?
>
> Anyway, then 'we' can indeed sit back and relax, and wait for clarification
> and/or the invitation from the LF.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
> Services & Solutions for Cloud-
> Based Manufacturing, Professional
> Services and Retail & Trade
> http://www.orrtiz.com
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <
> Ross.Gardler@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> > *we* do not have to ask it. The LF do.
> >
> > The ASF are responsible for proposing (via CFP) content. We are not
> > responsible for selecting it.
> >
> > Sent from my Windows Phone
> > ________________________________
> > From: Pierre Smits<mailto:pierre.smits@gmail.com>
> > Sent: ‎4/‎20/‎2015 8:05 AM
> > To: dev@community.apache.org<mailto:dev@community.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: Proposing tracks for ACEU15
> >
> > Asking 'Which content' delivers many viewpoints. You have to ask it first
> > to get the answers leading to focus for the best production ever.
> >
> > As stated in previous posting 'the ASF is responsible for content' and
> 'We
> > have little say in what it will be', please elaborate on this? Meaning:
> the
> > LF will take more control on who to invite for talks CFP? We can sit back
> > and relax?
> >
> > I stepped up. Again.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Pierre Smits
> >
> > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
> > Services & Solutions for Cloud-
> > Based Manufacturing, Professional
> > Services and Retail & Trade
> > http://www.orrtiz.com
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:49 PM, jan i <jani@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot for taking time to reach out to communities, and mailing
> it
> > > here.
> > >
> > > LF is responsible for producing the event, as well as carrying the
> > > financial responsibility,
> > > while ASF is responsible for the content. This seems very clear until
> you
> > > start asking
> > > "which content", because that highly influenced how popular the
> > conference
> > > will be.
> > >
> > > It is highly likely that ACEU 2015 will be differently structured, in
> > order
> > > to get a clearer
> > > marketing message. We expect that to be decided this week in close
> > > cooperation with
> > > LF. The CFP(s) will open shortly after, and I hope no later than next
> > week.
> > >
> > > rgds
> > > jan I.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 20 April 2015 at 16:36, Pierre Smits <pierre.smits@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > In the weeks prior to ACNA15 I have reached out to a few communities
> to
> > > > gather momentum for ACEU15. Based on what is in the portfolio of the
> > ASF
> > > > quite a lot of interesting tracks could be built. Before the doors of
> > the
> > > > CFP opens we could investigate potential topic clusters (anything
> > > > goes).  Anyway, I thought starting early gives a head start. Here
> are a
> > > few
> > > > examples:
> > > >
> > > > *Community building with the ASF*
> > > > About: How visions at the ASF and the Apache products can help
> building
> > > OS
> > > > Community
> > > > Topics could be:
> > > >
> > > >    - The Apache Maturity Model (or a generalisation thereof) -
> Betrand
> > > >    Delacrétaz
> > > >    - How a Code of Conduct Matters - Speaker TBD
> > > >    - A Case Study (PoC) of Community Management with OFBiz - Pierre
> > Smits
> > > >    - Due Process with Apache STeVe - Speaker TBD
> > > >    - Version Control with Apache Subversion - Speaker TBD
> > > >    - Directory Management with Apache Directory - Speaker TBD
> > > >    - Conferencing with Apache OpenMeetings
> > > >
> > > > *Securing With Apache products*
> > > > About: how Apache products support Identity Management, Security,
> > > > Authentication & Authorization
> > > > Topics could be:
> > > >
> > > >    - Directory Management with Apache Directory
> > > >    - RBAC enablement with Apache Fortress
> > > >    - The Security Framework of Apache CXF
> > > >    - Etc
> > > >
> > > > So you want big? We have BIG!
> > > > About the 'big' topics of today addressed by Apache
> products/processes
> > > >
> > > >    - Big Data Solutions
> > > >    - Scaling with Apache products
> > > >    - Managing a BIG community
> > > >    - etc
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Of course the above are just suggestions. Maybe we could introduce
> some
> > > > kind of tagging to create, beyond tracks, a have a kind of
> > > pathway/streams
> > > > of interests areas?
> > > >
> > > > I invite you to post your suggestions of tracks/streams/broad scope
> > > > interests areas to this thread at apachecon-discuss@a.o.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Pierre Smits
> > > >
> > > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
> > > > Services & Solutions for Cloud-
> > > > Based Manufacturing, Professional
> > > > Services and Retail & Trade
> > > > http://www.orrtiz.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message