community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Proposing tracks for ACEU15
Date Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:28:21 GMT
Quoting: '*we* do not have to ask it. The LF do'  But that 'we' is
confusing. Who is that? You? I? The coordinator? The Board?

Anyway, then 'we' can indeed sit back and relax, and wait for clarification
and/or the invitation from the LF.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <
Ross.Gardler@microsoft.com> wrote:

> *we* do not have to ask it. The LF do.
>
> The ASF are responsible for proposing (via CFP) content. We are not
> responsible for selecting it.
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ________________________________
> From: Pierre Smits<mailto:pierre.smits@gmail.com>
> Sent: ‎4/‎20/‎2015 8:05 AM
> To: dev@community.apache.org<mailto:dev@community.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Proposing tracks for ACEU15
>
> Asking 'Which content' delivers many viewpoints. You have to ask it first
> to get the answers leading to focus for the best production ever.
>
> As stated in previous posting 'the ASF is responsible for content' and 'We
> have little say in what it will be', please elaborate on this? Meaning: the
> LF will take more control on who to invite for talks CFP? We can sit back
> and relax?
>
> I stepped up. Again.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
> Services & Solutions for Cloud-
> Based Manufacturing, Professional
> Services and Retail & Trade
> http://www.orrtiz.com
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:49 PM, jan i <jani@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> >
> > Thanks a lot for taking time to reach out to communities, and mailing it
> > here.
> >
> > LF is responsible for producing the event, as well as carrying the
> > financial responsibility,
> > while ASF is responsible for the content. This seems very clear until you
> > start asking
> > "which content", because that highly influenced how popular the
> conference
> > will be.
> >
> > It is highly likely that ACEU 2015 will be differently structured, in
> order
> > to get a clearer
> > marketing message. We expect that to be decided this week in close
> > cooperation with
> > LF. The CFP(s) will open shortly after, and I hope no later than next
> week.
> >
> > rgds
> > jan I.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 20 April 2015 at 16:36, Pierre Smits <pierre.smits@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > In the weeks prior to ACNA15 I have reached out to a few communities to
> > > gather momentum for ACEU15. Based on what is in the portfolio of the
> ASF
> > > quite a lot of interesting tracks could be built. Before the doors of
> the
> > > CFP opens we could investigate potential topic clusters (anything
> > > goes).  Anyway, I thought starting early gives a head start. Here are a
> > few
> > > examples:
> > >
> > > *Community building with the ASF*
> > > About: How visions at the ASF and the Apache products can help building
> > OS
> > > Community
> > > Topics could be:
> > >
> > >    - The Apache Maturity Model (or a generalisation thereof) - Betrand
> > >    Delacrétaz
> > >    - How a Code of Conduct Matters - Speaker TBD
> > >    - A Case Study (PoC) of Community Management with OFBiz - Pierre
> Smits
> > >    - Due Process with Apache STeVe - Speaker TBD
> > >    - Version Control with Apache Subversion - Speaker TBD
> > >    - Directory Management with Apache Directory - Speaker TBD
> > >    - Conferencing with Apache OpenMeetings
> > >
> > > *Securing With Apache products*
> > > About: how Apache products support Identity Management, Security,
> > > Authentication & Authorization
> > > Topics could be:
> > >
> > >    - Directory Management with Apache Directory
> > >    - RBAC enablement with Apache Fortress
> > >    - The Security Framework of Apache CXF
> > >    - Etc
> > >
> > > So you want big? We have BIG!
> > > About the 'big' topics of today addressed by Apache products/processes
> > >
> > >    - Big Data Solutions
> > >    - Scaling with Apache products
> > >    - Managing a BIG community
> > >    - etc
> > >
> > >
> > > Of course the above are just suggestions. Maybe we could introduce some
> > > kind of tagging to create, beyond tracks, a have a kind of
> > pathway/streams
> > > of interests areas?
> > >
> > > I invite you to post your suggestions of tracks/streams/broad scope
> > > interests areas to this thread at apachecon-discuss@a.o.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Pierre Smits
> > >
> > > *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
> > > Services & Solutions for Cloud-
> > > Based Manufacturing, Professional
> > > Services and Retail & Trade
> > > http://www.orrtiz.com
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message