Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C8E010D83 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 22:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35351 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2015 22:39:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 35080 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2015 22:39:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 35064 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2015 22:39:07 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 22:39:07 +0000 Received: from mail-qg0-f48.google.com (mail-qg0-f48.google.com [209.85.192.48]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 63AC01A026E for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 22:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qgdz60 with SMTP id z60so16322508qgd.1 for ; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 14:39:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.50.79 with SMTP id y76mr9607564qky.20.1425681546550; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 14:39:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.169.204 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:39:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54FA2BA4.9050306@shanecurcuru.org> References: <54F9DB53.1030005@redhat.com> <54FA2BA4.9050306@shanecurcuru.org> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 17:39:06 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Replace projects.apache.org with projects-new.apache.org From: Christopher To: dev@community.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11471a402522dc0510a65aca --001a11471a402522dc0510a65aca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > Question: is there any plan to redirect old URLs? > > The old projects.a.o certainly is clunky, but there may well be a few > people who have linked to various parts of the site. > > Similarly, are we still using DOAP files? I could imagine that there > are others who were also referring to individual DOAPs or to the > projects.a.o/feeds content. > > These may not be widely used features, but if we're nuking them we > should be explicit about that and provide some notice about them being > gone. > > +1; it'd be nice to know that we don't have to update them anymore, if that's the case. --001a11471a402522dc0510a65aca--