Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DD0C17D23 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 16:00:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54974 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2015 16:00:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 54740 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2015 16:00:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 54729 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2015 16:00:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 16:00:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Ross.Gardler@microsoft.com designates 157.56.110.141 as permitted sender) Received: from [157.56.110.141] (HELO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) (157.56.110.141) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 16:00:06 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.142.20) by BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.142.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.106.11; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 15:59:24 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.142.20]) by BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.142.20]) with mapi id 15.01.0106.007; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 15:59:24 +0000 From: "Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)" To: "dev@community.apache.org" Subject: RE: What's the ideal job title for somebody who is payed to help ASF communities grow? Thread-Topic: What's the ideal job title for somebody who is payed to help ASF communities grow? Thread-Index: AQHQWeQ4s21LZwT4VECdJ3KwqhSnzZ0TGLgMgAAEHACAAAGqmYAAAvSAgAADoACAACSxgIAAExuWgABJ6wCAABNZoIAAjUwAgAAI0HU= Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 15:59:24 +0000 Message-ID: References: , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [184.11.141.79] authentication-results: community.apache.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR03MB490; x-forefront-antispam-report: BMV:1;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(164054003)(13464003)(51704005)(377454003)(24454002)(2656002)(2950100001)(106116001)(93886004)(54356999)(102836002)(76176999)(92566002)(66066001)(19580405001)(110136001)(87936001)(86612001)(2501003)(16236675004)(19625215002)(2351001)(19580395003)(77096005)(74316001)(76576001)(2900100001)(46102003)(107886001)(15975445007)(33656002)(86362001)(77156002)(62966003)(40100003)(122556002)(50986999)(19273905006)(450100001)(19617315012)(99286002)(563064011);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:BY2PR03MB490;H:BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:sfv;LANG:en; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004)(5002009)(5005006);SRVR:BY2PR03MB490;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR03MB490; x-forefront-prvs: 05102978A2 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY2PR03MB490B51425BE94D6B4D8C024991B0BY2PR03MB490namprd_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Mar 2015 15:59:24.3695 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR03MB490 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_BY2PR03MB490B51425BE94D6B4D8C024991B0BY2PR03MB490namprd_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1256" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I invite Roman and anyone facing such a problem to approach the PMCs in que= stion. If the PMCs are not recognizing this kind of merit then there is a c= ommunity problem. Merit is merit and such people should be given committer= status. This is documented at the ASF level and in some projects. It should be docu= mented in all. See CoPDoC http://community.apache.org/contributors/index.ht= ml We don't have to accept that projects often fail to recognize some kinds of= merit. Ross Sent from my Windows Phone ________________________________ From: Ted Dunning Sent: =FD3/=FD9/=FD2015 8:29 AM To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: Re: What's the ideal job title for somebody who is payed to help A= SF communities grow? Roman's distinction was a practical one that arises from the fact that a large majority of projects have this problem. The reflection into Roman's practical situation is that the community developer people he wants to hire don't have an Apache bestowed title that reflects their activities. (I can't say I have sampled all of the problems so maybe I shouldn't say "large majority". I have pretty high gut confidence in the characterization, however) On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) < Ross.Gardler@microsoft.com> wrote: > I said "the ASF" not "Apache Foo". I do agree with your observation with > respect to Apache Foo. Any project which fails to recognize merit of any > sort should reconsider its position (and I agree that this means most > projects). > > However, for the ASF there is no distinction. That's why I'm challenging > the distinction Roman is making in his question here. > > Ross > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunning@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2015 10:53 PM > To: dev@community.apache.org > Subject: Re: What's the ideal job title for somebody who is payed to help > ASF communities grow? > > Ideally and aspirationally, that is true. Practically speaking, > definitely not true. > > > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) < > Ross.Gardler@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > Once again, the ASF makes no distinction between code and other > > contributions. > > > > Sent from Windows Mail > > > > From: Roman Shaposhnik > > Sent: ?Sunday?, ?March? ?8?, ?2015 ?5?:?21? ?PM > > To: ComDev > > > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 3:08 PM, David Nalley wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Roman Shaposhnik > > > > > wrote: > > >> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) > > >> wrote: > > >>> Who said we allow it for engineers? My position is the same for > > >>> any > > community member no matter what they do. > > >> > > >> It is all over LI and resumes. Here's a good example: > > >> https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=3D759319 > > >> "Developer at Apache Maven" > > >> > > > > > > But he is an Apache Maven developer. (and committer, and PMC member). > > > That's very different than hiring someone off the street with a > > > $bigco job title of Maven Developer with no standing in the community= . > > > > How is it different if a person is considered a bonafide member of the > > community but his contributions are not code? Why that person can't > > have a similar title? > > > > Thanks, > > Roman. > > > --_000_BY2PR03MB490B51425BE94D6B4D8C024991B0BY2PR03MB490namprd_--