Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org
Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <550C3063.6050902@rcbowen.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:36:19 -0400
From: Rich Bowen <rbowen@rcbowen.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: commit rights to ComDev non-community.a.o site resources
References: <17612679.0LQvIchjWZ@herve-desktop>
 <5505F892.5080401@spielviel.de>
 <CADPkm87p0LOhT9nvsLcPh7PBsfOPNW4tpT1_ZxLozrGGfdtWbA@mail.gmail.com>
 <965CE22B-BAE7-4EC8-BFEC-991071C734FB@spielviel.de>
 <550B0237.8030403@spielviel.de> <550B027C.90904@spielviel.de>
 <BY2PR03MB490BDFB67C299D8670976AE99010@BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <BY2PR03MB490BDFB67C299D8670976AE99010@BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

+1

On 03/19/2015 01:27 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
> +1 to lazy consensus - this is a reversible step
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ulrich Stärk [mailto:uli@spielviel.de]
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 10:08 AM
> To: dev@community.apache.org
> Subject: Re: commit rights to ComDev non-community.a.o site resources
>
> Actually I just realized how dumb that question is.
>
> So: I assume lazy consensus and will go ahead and modify the permissions if nobody objects within the next 72 hours.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Uli
>
> On 2015-03-19 18:07, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
>> So shall we put this to a vote or may I assume lazy consensus?
>>
>> If so I'd go ahead and modify the permissions accordingly.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Uli
>>
>> On 2015-03-16 09:21, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
>>> One doesn't exclude the other. I'd first like us to establish whether committership to the ComDev code is by invitation only or open to all existing Apache committers (which I'd prefer).
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Uli
>>>
>>>> Am 15.03.2015 um 23:22 schrieb Pierre Smits <pierre.smits@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Why not register the solution as a component of the COMDEV project
>>>> in JIRA, and do the same as any other ASF project does when it comes to code:
>>>> register and evaluate issues, have patches registered there and have
>>>> invited committers work from there.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Pierre Smits
>>>>
>>>> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud-
>>>> Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade
>>>> http://www.orrtiz.com
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Ulrich Stärk <uli@spielviel.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Heh.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I put that sentence in the board report we didn't have
>>>>> projects-new yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't see a reason why we shouldn't open up those two (or even
>>>>> all of
>>>>> /comdev) for all committers
>>>>> as long as changes are first discussed on our lists.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do others think?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Uli
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2015-03-14 16:38, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I lately gave patches for projects-new that were not applied: it
>>>>>> seems
>>>>> there
>>>>>> is a problem to determine who should do it (to avoid projects-new
>>>>>> to be a single-man affair).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then I made some investigations: in the last board report for
>>>>>> ComDev
>>>>> [1], I
>>>>>> think I found the cause:
>>>>>> "Since artifacts produced by ComDev are usually documentation on
>>>>>> our
>>>>> website
>>>>>> which is writable for all Apache committers, we usually do not add
>>>>> committers
>>>>>> to the ComDev project."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then should projects(-new).apache.org become writeable for all
>>>>>> Apache committers too? Same for reporter.apache.org?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hervé
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Community_Development.html
>>>>>


-- 
Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon