Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D68810FE0 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 21:25:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78824 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2015 21:25:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-community-dev-archive@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 78501 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2015 21:25:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@community.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@community.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@community.apache.org Received: (qmail 78490 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2015 21:25:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 21:25:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of uli@spielviel.de designates 83.223.83.232 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.223.83.232] (HELO uli.spielviel.de) (83.223.83.232) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 21:25:18 +0000 Received: from STAUL-AMBP.fritz.box (unknown [84.175.65.148]) by uli.spielviel.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D11E5D0CA3 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 22:24:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5505F892.5080401@spielviel.de> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 22:24:34 +0100 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Ulrich_St=E4rk?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: Re: commit rights to ComDev non-community.a.o site resources References: <17612679.0LQvIchjWZ@herve-desktop> In-Reply-To: <17612679.0LQvIchjWZ@herve-desktop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Heh. When I put that sentence in the board report we didn't have projects-new yet. I don't see a reason why we shouldn't open up those two (or even all of /comdev) for all committers as long as changes are first discussed on our lists. What do others think? Cheers, Uli On 2015-03-14 16:38, Herv� BOUTEMY wrote: > Hi, > > I lately gave patches for projects-new that were not applied: it seems there > is a problem to determine who should do it (to avoid projects-new to be a > single-man affair). > > Then I made some investigations: in the last board report for ComDev [1], I > think I found the cause: > "Since artifacts produced by ComDev are usually documentation on our website > which is writable for all Apache committers, we usually do not add committers > to the ComDev project." > > Then should projects(-new).apache.org become writeable for all Apache > committers too? Same for reporter.apache.org? > > Regards, > > Herv� > > [1] https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Community_Development.html >