community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Vesse <>
Subject Re: Veto! Veto?
Date Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:36:19 GMT
On 21/03/2015 19:24, "Pierre Smits" <> wrote:

>If in stead of the veto possibility the simple majority rule was at play,
>it might have been so that fewer project would have reported consecutively
>that no new people were onboarded

A lack of new people on-boarded does not necessarily indicate a project in
trouble (though it may do so).  More often than not in my experience (at
least outside of the Incubator which is a special case) it represents an
established mature project with a low rate of turnover and attrition in
the active community.

If the PMC worries they are stagnating personnel wise they should report
that in their board report or a PMC member could report privately to
board@ if they think there is an issue that the PMC is not publicly

On the other hand if the board thinks the projects lack of new
committers/PMC members is an issue then they can and will follow up on
that with the relevant PMC.


View raw message