community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Veto! Veto?
Date Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:28:03 GMT
If it weren't all that difficult and imported to do the righteous thing, we
wouldn't have all the 'voting' aspects defined in our by-laws, and we could
run the ASF as one of its projects.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Pierre Smits <pierre.smits@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> You can't coerce consensus regarding procedural issues by saying:   'do it
> my way or I veto!'
> Soon everybody will: veto. Veto. Veto! VETO. VETO!!
>
> Even vetoing a vote is not generating consensus.
>
>
> --
> Pierre Smits
>
> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
> Services & Solutions for Cloud-
> Based Manufacturing, Professional
> Services and Retail & Trade
> http://www.orrtiz.com
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message