community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)" <Ross.Gard...@microsoft.com>
Subject RE: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016
Date Thu, 12 Mar 2015 22:44:19 GMT
Right, thanks David, I'm not sure where this confusion came from but it is cleared up now.

Let me ping Jim and Roberto offlist and we'll have something concrete to get to Uli in the
next report.

Ross

Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation

-----Original Message-----
From: David Nalley [mailto:david@gnsa.us] 
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 3:16 PM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016

Infra doesn't use extras, or even administer it, so it seems strange for us to have a stake
in decision making. We are happy to help facilitate the move (and hence our involvement thus
far).

On Thursday, March 12, 2015, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) < Ross.Gardler@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> It seems there is confusion over who owns the decision. Happy for it 
> to be ComDev if you are happy from infra perspective.
>
> Ross
>
> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
> A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Nalley [mailto:david@gnsa.us <javascript:;>]
> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 2:37 PM
> To: dev@community.apache.org <javascript:;>
> Subject: Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016
>
> It is my understanding that moving to SF from Google Code is a ComDev 
> decision. I have interacted with SF and then brought the PoCs they've 
> done here, but AFAIK, no decision has been made.
>
> --David
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) < 
> Ross.Gardler@microsoft.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > Ahhh... I see no that's just code for I don't have time, but these 
> > folks have shown interest ;-)
> >
> > I'm happy to help make sure we hit this deadline, but I'm not driving it.
> >
> > Ross
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ulrich Stärk [mailto:uli@spielviel.de <javascript:;>]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 1:50 PM
> > To: dev@community.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > Subject: Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016
> >
> > *Really* moving board@ to BCC ;)
> >
> > You said you put people in contact with each other so I was under 
> > the
> impression you were actively part of a group driving this.
> >
> > Jim, do you have any updates on the current status?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Uli
> >
> > On 2015-03-12 21:40, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
> >> Moving board@ to BCC
> >>
> >> I am *not* working on it. I have no idea who said I was (I do hope 
> >> it wasn't me!)
> >>
> >> All I know is that Jim, David and Roberto are working on it, I 
> >> don't know how actively but it is now a priority.
> >>
> >> I believe Jim is involved wearing his ComDev hat so (with his
> >> agreement) you can look to him for those updates. David is wearing 
> >> his
> infra hat and Roberto wears his SF hat.
> >>
> >> Ross
> >>
> >> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft 
> >> Corporation
> >>
> >> -----Original Message----- From: Ulrich Stärk 
> >> [mailto:uli@spielviel.de <javascript:;>] Sent: Thursday, March 12,
> >> 2015 1:36 PM To: dev@community.apache.org <javascript:;> Cc:
> board@apache.org <javascript:;>
> >> Subject: Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016
> >>
> >> We reported about apache extras in September and November and both 
> >> times we were told that Jim, Ross, David and Roberto were working 
> >> on it. Some time in October David asked for feedback on a proof of
> concept, no news since then.
> >>
> >> Can you shed some light on who is driving this atm?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Uli
> >>
> >> On 2015-03-12 21:22, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
> >>> Today Google announced that Google Code will be shutting down Jan 
> >>> 25,
> 2016.
> >>>
> >>> We need to create a replacement for Apache-extras. Can we please 
> >>> make sure that progress on this is reported in the ComDev board 
> >>> report
> each quarter.
> >>>
> >>> I suggest the starting point should be to expand discussions with 
> >>> SourceForge, they have offered neighborhoods in the past. David, 
> >>> with his infra hat, has been exploring options for download 
> >>> provision
> already (I'm not sure of the current status).
> >>>
> >>> (and as a reminder, this is why we don't like to use services 
> >>> provided by external companies)
> >>>
> >>> Ross
> >>>
> >>> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft 
> >>> Corporation
> >>>
> >>>
>
Mime
View raw message