community-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Gruno <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Replace with
Date Sun, 08 Mar 2015 18:35:33 GMT

On 2015-03-08 19:33, Hitesh Shah wrote:
> Thanks for the info, Daniel. Updated. In terms of keeping project info updated, is this
info along with all the release info, etc. being pulled from the project DOAP files? If not,
do we still need to maintain them?
No, if/when gets replaced with the new system, you 
do not need to maintain doap files.
As for the data update, I did see you push the save button a few times 
there ;). Your browser probably caches the json objects for N minutes, 
which is why you did not notice that the data had indeed been updated. 
Once we move this to a faster TLS terminator, we can look at updating 
JSON objects more often within browsers.

With regards,
> Do I need to do anything additional for it to show up in the listing on
or will something eventually kick in to add it to the index?
> seems to show my updates.
> thanks
> — Hitesh
> On Mar 7, 2015, at 2:12 AM, Daniel Gruno <> wrote:
>> Hi Hitesh,
>> log onto and go to the bottom. Pick 'tez' as
the PMC and nothing as the sub-project name, click the button and start typing :) That will
create a tez.json file that the site will then use.
>> With regards,
>> Daniel.
>> On 2015-03-07 04:56, Hitesh Shah wrote:
>>> Same question for Apache Tez. How do we need to fix the new website to show the
Tez project?
>>> thanks
>>> — Hitesh
>>> On Mar 6, 2015, at 1:46 PM, Marshall Schor <> wrote:
>>>> I can see the Apache UIMA entry in the "old" page, but it's not listed on
>>>> new page.  What needs fixing?
>>>> -Marshall Schor
>>>> On 3/6/2015 11:52 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>>>> I'd like for us to go ahead and replace with
>>>>> It now has all the functionality that projects.a.o
>>>>> has, and much more, and there's no reason to have two sites up. If you
>>>>> to moving forward with this, please say so.
>>>>> [ ] +1, do it
>>>>> [ ] +0, whatevs
>>>>> [ ] -1, No (and say why, so we can address the problem)
>>>>> --Rich

View raw message